THE SYSTEM OF SEMANTIC VALENCY IN THE KAZAKH LANGUAGE

The article considers the potential of creating a system of categories of consistency and valence in the Kazakh language. To distinguish the typical types of phrases that make up the valence system, an experiment is carried out. In the Kazakh language, phrases are not enough to be divided into two parts: syntactic and lexical. The issue of expanding forms, concretizing patterns, in-depth study of the abilities of the valence of the Kazakh language will be considered. Compatibility is the main property of language units based on the syntagmatic relation. The syntagmatic relation is the ability of linguistic symbols to be harmoniously combined in accordance with the regularity of the language, depending on the order of the sequential arrangement in the composition of the text, sentence, word. Compatibility is a linguistic category that functions in all linguistic areas. The stereotypical concept “compatibility is a combination of two or more words” is recognized only as a form of grammatical compatibility. Thus, compatibility is an important category in determining the phonetic, lexical, morphological, and syntactic patterns of a language. Here compatibility is considered equally with the concept of valency. Because valence itself is the main indicator that refl the ability of all language units in the structure of the text, starting with the sound layer.

1. A1. Ablakov A. (1986) Successful phrases in the Kazakh language. – Almaty. – 211 P. [in Kazakh].

2. Akhmanova O. S. (1971) questions of optimization of natural communication systems. – Moscow. – 211 P. [in Russian].

3. Baltabayeva Zh. (1984) “Semantic and stylistic functions of the original native and vinitic pad in the Kazakh language” // PhD thesis, Almaty. – 165 P. [in Kazakh].

4. Bondzio V. (2000) Theoryvalence and language training / IASH. Moscow. – No. 5. – p. 14-25.

5. Isaev S. (1997) Refl on the Kazakh language. – Almaty. – 256 P. [in Kazakh].

6. Kotelova N. Z. (1975) The Meaning of words and its meaning (to formalize in the language) / N.Z. Kotelova. – Leningrad. – 164 P. [in Russian].

7. Kubryakova E.S. (1979) Lexical and syntactic meaning of words and their refl in the processes of speech. – Moscow. [in Russian].

8. Kuznetsov A.M., Katsnelson S.D. (2002) // Domestic linguists XX Vek. H. 1 / OTV. Ed. “I’m Sorry,” He Said. Moscow: INION RAN, – P. 392. [in Russian].

9. Leikina B.M. (2003) Glagolye stanovleniya and glagolye beginning in the modern English language. – Leningrad. – 405 s. [in Russian].

10. Momynova B. Spelling of complex structured terms and their inclusion in the dictionary of combinations. // FB 12. 03. 2020. [in Kazakh].

11. Muhin A.M. (2012) // https: //www.studmed.ru /. [in Kazakh].

12. Orazov M. (1998) Semantics of the Kazakh language. Almaty. – 220 P. [in Kazakh].

13. Ramsted R. I. (1950) Introduction to the Altai language. Moscow. – 421 P. [in Russian].

14. Sagyndykuly B. (1998) Etymological bases of the development of vocabulary of the Kazakh language. – Almaty. – 196 P. [in Kazakh].

15. Stepanova M.D. (1973) Theory of Valentines and Valentines analysis. – Moscow. – 261c. [in Russian].

16. Syzdykova G.O. (2010) Semantic Valence in the Kazakh language: Phil. science. doct. dis. abstract. Almaty. – 168 P. [in Kazakh].

17. Teniere L. (2000) Fundamentals of structural syntax / L. Teniere // introduction. St. and general. Ed. V. G. Gaka. – Moscow: Progress, – 656 P. [in Russian].

18. Khasanov G. (2009) Lexical syntagmatics of the Kazakh language: diss prepared for the degree of Doctor of Philological Sciences. abstract. Specialty 10.02.02 / Khasanov, Gabit Kairzhanovich, Almaty. – 46 p. [in Kazakh].