Phraseological Units Related to Cereal Crop Names in Kazakh, Russian, and English

The article considers phraseological units related to the names of cereal crops in the Kazakh, Russian and English languages. In this regard, the purpose of the study is based on a comparative study of the names of cereal crops in the Kazakh, Russian and English languages from a cognitive aspect. Understanding the specifics of each nation through its language is an important issue of modern linguistic communication. Therefore, the tasks were set, firstly, to describe the semantic features of the names of cereal crops in the Kazakh language; secondly, to describe the semantic features of the phraseological concepts of cereal crops in Russian and English and to study the linguistic and cultural features of the names of cereal crops in unrelated languages. The main problem of this article is that at present, comparative research of the phraseological systems of these languages is insufficiently developed. It should be noted that for a long time phraseological units of the Kazakh language have not been subjected to in-depth scientific analysis. This article presents a comparative analysis of phraseological units of the Russian, English and Kazakh languages, aimed at studying interlingual phraseological units and identifying their correspondence. Theoretical and empirical methods were used when writing this article. The material was collected using the following groups of research methods: analysis, comparison, observation, modeling method, continuous sampling method. 10 sources that met the review criteria were included in the study. The material for this study was Kazakh, Russian and English phraseological units selected from authoritative Kazakh, Russian and English phraseological dictionaries. The main conclusions of this article are that each language has its own phraseological units. That is, phraseological units have certain similarities and differences, which are often due to the differences in language, national culture, value priorities and mentality of each person. In this regard, the level of value of the study is determined. The results of the research can be used as an additional source in research, lectures and practical classes in ethnolinguistics, linguoculturology, linguistics and other fields, when compiling dictionaries and texts. 

1. Barkibaeva, R.R., Zholdasbekova, B.O., Bajanbaeva, Zh.A. (2019) Russkaja frazeologija: konnotativnyj aspekt obuchenija. Almaty: Qazaq universitetі. 175 b. [Barkibayeva, R.R., Zholdasbekova, B.O., Bayanbayeva, Zh.A. (2019) Russian Phraseology: Connotative Aspect of Learning. Almaty: Qazaq universitetі. 175 s.] (in Russian)

2. Bykova, O.I. (2005) Jetnokonnotacija kak vid kul`turnoj konnotacii (na materiale nominativnyh edinic nemeckogo jazyka): monografija. Voronezh: Voronezhskij gosudarstvennyj universitet. 40 s. [Bykova, O.I. (2005) Ethnoconnotation as a type of cultural connotation (based on nominative units of the German language. Voronezh: Voronezhskij gosudarstvennyi universitet. 40 s.] (in Russian)

3. Hasanova, M.T. (2014) Semanticheskaja struktura frazeologicheskih edinic s komponentom cvetooboznachenija v anglijskom i kazahskom jazykah. Molodoj uchjonyj. No.19(78). S. 682-687. [Khassanova, M.T. (2014) Semantic structure of phraseological units with a color designation component in English and Kazakh languages. The Young learned. No.19 (78). Pp. 682-687.] (in Russian)

4. Jurina, E.A. (2020) Mezhjazykovaja obraznost` kak lingvokognitivnyj fenomen. Tomsk: Izdatel'stvo Tomskogo universiteta. 160 s. [Yurina, E.A. (2020) Interlinguistic imagery as a linguacognitive phenomenon. Tomsk: Tomsk University Press. 160 p.] (in Russian)

5. Kuanyshbaeva, G.B. (2016) Osobennosti frazeologicheskih oborotov kazahskogo jazyka. Molodoj uchenyj. No.12 (116). S. 1012-1014. [Kuanyshbayeva, G.B. (2016) Peculiarities of phraseological units of the Kazakh language. No.12 (116). Pp. 1012-1014.] (in Russian)

6. Mamedova E.C., Kadymova A.A. (2019) Rastitel`nye frazeologicheskie edinicy. ELMİ İŞ. (humanitar elmlәr üzrә aylıq beynalxalq elmi jurnal). No.1(2). S. 3. [Mamedova, E.C., Kadymova, A.A. (2019) Plant phraseological units. ELMİ İŞ. (humanitar elmlar üzra aylıq beynalxalq elmi jurnal). No.1(2). S. 3.] (in Russian)

7. Maslova, V.A. (2001) Lingvokul`turologija: ucheb. posobie dlja stud. vyssh. ucheb, zavedenij. Moskva: Izdatel'skij centr «Akademija». 208 s. [Maslova, V.A. (2001) Linguoculturology: a textbook for Students of Higher Education Institutions. Moscow: Publishing Center “Academy”. 208 p.] (in Russian)

8. Plisov, E.V. (2016) Obraz hleba v russkoj, nemeckoj i anglijskoj kartinah mira. Vestnik KRAUNC. Gumanitarnye nauki. No. 2(28). S. 20-31 [Plisov, E.V. (2016) The image of bread in Russian, German and English pictures of the world. No. 2(28). Pp. 20-31.] (in Russian)

9. Slobodenjuk, E.A. (2016) Sozdanie obraza britanskogo i nemeckogo politika v sovremennom mediadiskurse Velikobritanii v aspekte oppozicii “svoj – chuzhoj”. Nizhnij Novgorod. S. 26-33. [Slobodenyuk, E.A. (2016) The creation of the image of a British and German politician in the modern media discourse of Great Britain in the aspect of the opposition “friend or foe”. Nizhniy Novgorod. Pp. 26-33.] (in Russian)

10. Soltanbekova, O.T., Kalimova, Zh.Ү. (2020) Sopostavitel`noe izuchenie frazeologizmov v anglijskom, russkom i kazahskom jazykah (na materiale frazeologicheskogo kal`kirovanija). Vestnik Kazahskogo univ. mezhdunarodnyh otoshenij i mirovyh jazykov imeni Abylaj hana. Serija Filologicheskie nauki. T. 58. No. 3. [Soltanbekova O.T., Kalimova Zh.Ү. (2020) Comparative study of phraseological units in English, Russian and Kazakh languages (based on phraseological tracing. Bulletin of the abylai Khan Kazakh National University. Philological Sciences series. T. 58. No. 3.] (in Russian)

11. Telija, V.N. (1996) Russkaja frazeologija: Semanticheskij pragmaticheskij i lingvokul`turologicheskij aspekty. Moskva: Shkola “Jazyki russkoj kul`tury”. 245 s. [Teliya, V.N. (1996) Russian Phraseology: Semantic, Pragmatic and Linguocultural Aspects. Moscow: Shkola “Yazyki russkoi kultury”. 245 p.] (in Russian)