The Role of Invective Vocabulary in Speech Etiquette among the Youth of Kazakhstan
https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2025-4-224-238
Abstract
The present article is devoted to the role of invective vocabulary among the youth of Kazakhstan in modern society. It defines the sense and purpose of invective vocabulary, as well as its types of meaning. The study observes changes in the direction and function of invective vocabulary in peer-reviewed linguistic articles published over the last three years. The objective of the article is to highlight the role of invective vocabulary in the linguistic discourse of modern society. To achieve the objective, the article sets the following tasks: 1) to conduct a survey among Kazakh- and Russian-speaking audiences aged 18-40; 2) to determine the purpose and function of using invective vocabulary based on the obtained data; 3) to analyze invective vocabulary as a separate linguistic unit expressing national identity. The research showed that invective vocabulary is frequently used to express anger and indignation. While the use of obscene language is generally perceived as less acceptable in the Kazakh-speaking environment, the survey results indicate a higher level of tolerance toward such language among the Russian-speaking respondents. This is attributed to differences in mentality and upbringing. Furthermore, the linguistic and cultural analysis was focused on the words “it”, “shoshqa”, and “mal” (English “dog”, “pig”, “cattle”). It has been discovered that certain linguistic units may have different meanings in one language, but not necessarily have negative connotations in another language.
About the Authors
S. MettibayevaKazakhstan
Sandugash Mettibayeva, Corresponding Author, Doctoral Student
Almaty
I. Baissydyk
Kazakhstan
Indira Baissydyk, Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Acting Associate Professor
Almaty
R. Dossymbekova
Kazakhstan
Rauan Dossymbekova, Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Almaty
References
1. Bakhtiyarova, G.R., Meirkhanova, A.A., Sagadatov, R.T. (2023) Education of communication culture of young students through the works of Abai Kunanbayuly. Pedagogical Science. No.4 (71). (in English)
2. Banman, P.P. (2013) Invective vocabulary as a marker of disharmonization of communication in the “friend-foe” opposition. Philological Sciences. Questions of Theory and Practice. № 8(26): in 2 parts. Part II. P. 32-37. (in English)
3. Beljaeva, I.V. (2017) Konflikty v mediasrede: prichiny, dinamika i sposoby preduprezhdenija. Mediaskop. №2. [Belyayeva, I.V. (2017) Conflicts in the media environment: causes, dynamics, and prevention methods. Mediascope, No.2.] (in Russian)
4. Brusenskaja, L.A. (2016) Konfliktologicheskaja kompetentnostʹ kak jelement professionalʹnoj podgotovki. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka. №4. S. 112-116. [Brusenskaya, L.A. (2016) Conflict competence as an element of professional training. Pedagogical Education and Science, No.4. P. 112-116.] (in Russian)
5. Burdina, E.S. (2023) The influence of profanity on the intellectual and mental development of children. Skif. No.8 (84), P. 22-26. (in English)
6. Chernobrovkina, E.P., Suvorovceva, R.S. (2011) Rechevaja agressija v molodezhnoj subkul’ture: zashchita ili napadenie? Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta, 2. S. 104-110. [Chernobrovkina, E.P., Suvorovtseva, R.S. (2011) Speech aggression in youth subculture: defense or attack? Vestnik Irkutsk State Linguistic University, 2. P. 104-110.] (in Russian)
7. Ermakova, O.P. (2001) Jazykovaja agressija v sovremennoj kommunikacii. Moskva: Nauka. [Yermakova, O.P. (2001) Linguistic aggression in modern communication. Moscow: Nauka.] (in Russian)
8. Kirov, E.F. (2016) Gendernaja poljarizacija russkojazychnogo zvuchashhego diskursa [Jelektronnyj resurs] [Kirov, E.V. (2016) Gender polarization of Russian-speaking discourse. URL: www.gramota.ru/biblio/magazines/gramota/28_413 (date of request: 18.09.2016)](in Russian)
9. Klaiberg, Yu.A. (2001) Psihologija deviantnogo povedenija: uchebnoe posobie dlja vuzov. Moskva: TTC “Sfera”, pri uchastii “Jurait-M”. [Klayberg, Yu.A. (2001) Psychology of deviant behavior: a textbook for universities. Moscow: Sfera; Yurait-M.] (in Russian)
10. Kulumbegova, L.V. (2014) Cennostnye orientacii lichnosti kak faktor konfliktnogo povedenija. Vestnik Adygejskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 3: Pedagogika i psihologija. №4. S. 125-132. [Kulumbegova, L.V. (2014) Value orientations of personality as a factor of conflict behavior. Bulletin of Adyghe State University, Series 3: Pedagogy and Psychology. No.4. P. 125-132.] (in Russian)
11. Mamaeva, G.B. (2003) Erler men ajelderdіng soz qoldanuyndagy erekshelіkter (genderlіk zertteuler): filologija gylymdarynyng kandidaty darezhesіn alu ushіn dajyndalgan dissertacija. Almaty, 150 b. [Mamayeva, G.B. (2003) Peculiarities in men's and women's word usage (gender studies): Candidate Thesis for the degree of Candidate of Philological Sciences. Almaty, 150 p.] (in Russian)
12. Mandrikova, G.M.(2011) Invektivnaja leksika v studencheskoj rechi. Aktual'nye problemy germanistiki, romanistiki i rusistiki. №1. S. 208-216. [Mandrikova, G.M. (2011) Invective vocabulary in student’s speech. Current Problems of German Studies, Roman Studies and Russian Studies. No.1. P. 208-216.] (in Russian)
13. Meshkova, I.V., Zav'jalova, L.P. (2021) Otnoshenie sovremennoj molodjozhi k nenormativnoj leksike v kontekste vospitanija podrastajushhego pokolenija. Mir nauki. Pedagogika i psihologija. №4. T. 9. [Meshkova, I.V., Zavyalova, L.P. (2021) The attitude of modern youth to profanity in the context of educating a younger generation. World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology. No.4. Vol. 9.] (in Russian)
14. Mikhailin, V.Yu. (1997) Russkaja brannaja leksika kak sociokul’turnyj fenomen. Moskva: Ladomir. [Mikhailin, V.Yu. (1997) Russian obscene vocabulary as a sociocultural phenomenon. Moscow: Ladomir.] (in Russian)
15. Momynova, B.Q. (2005) Qazaq tіlіndegі qogamdyq sajasi leksika: aleumettіk-bagalauyshtyq sozzhasam. Almaty: Qazaq universitetі, 139 b. [Momynova, B.K. (2005) Public Political Vocabulary in the Kazakh language: socio-evaluative vocabulary. Almaty: Kazakh University. P. 139.] (in Kazakh)
16. Paceba, O.V. (2009) Rechevaja agressija v massovoj kommunikacii. Kiev: Naukova Dumka. [Patseba, O.V. (2009) Speech aggression in mass communication. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka.] (in Russian/Ukrainian)
17. Panov, Ju.A.(2000) Vlijanie social'no-jekonomicheskih processov na jekspansiju snizhennoj leksiki v sovremennom russkom jazyke. Jazykovaja struktura i social'naja sreda. Voronezh. Rezhim dostupa: http://tpl1999.narod.ru/WebStud1/SbornikSt1-1.htm#_Toc483136408 [Panov, Yu.A. (2000) The influence of socioeconomic processes on expansion of the reduced vocabulary in the modern Russian language. Linguistic Structure and Social Environment: Interuniversity Collection of Scientific Papers of Students. Voronezh. http://tpl1999.narod.ru/WebStud1/SbornikSt1-1.htm#_Toc483136408.] (in Russian)
18. Qazaq adebi tilining sozdigi. On bes tomdyq. (2011) Qurast: M. Malbaqov, Q. Esenova, B. Hinajat zhane t.b. Almaty: Qazaq jenciklopedijasy. [Dictionary of the Kazakh Literary Language (2011) Fifteen volume. Almaty: Kazakh Encyclopedia.] (in Kazakh)
19. Ratbekova, A.T. (2020) Language conflict as a research subject of linguistic forensics. Bulletin of SDU, 1 (52). P. 11- 23. (in English)
20. Rumjanceva, M.A. (2021) Invektivnaja leksika v politicheskom prostranstve kak pokazatel' tolerantnosti sovremennogo obshhestva. Problemy i perspektivy razvitija nauki v Rossii i mire. Ufa: Ajeterna, 246 s. [Rumyantseva, M.A. (2021) Invective vocabulary in the political space as an indicator of tolerance of modern society. Problems and Prospects of the Development of Science in Russia and the World: Collection of Articles of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference. Ufa: Aeterna. 246 p.] (in Russian)
21. Sarzhina, O.V. (2007) Oskorblenie slovom (invektiva) kak agressivnyj diskurs. Jurislingvistika. №8. [Sarzhina, O.V. (2007) Verbal abuse (invective) as aggressive discourse. Jurisprudence. No.8.] (in Russian)
22. Sedov, K.F. (2003) Diskurs i lichnost’. Moskva: Labirint. [Sedov, K.F. (2003) Discourse and personality. Moscow: Labirint.] (in Russian)
23. Toktarova, A.B. (2023) Classification of Kazakh language profanity and adaptation of the machine learning method to their identification. Bulletin of Abai Kazakh National University, Series “Physical-Mathematical Sciences”, №2 (82). P. 289-297. (in English)
24. Turabaeva, L. (2019) Soz qoldanu madenietі zhane tіl tazalyqy. Tіltanym. №4. B. 27-32. [Turabayeva, L. (2019) Word usage culture and language purity. Tiltanym. No.4. P. 27-32.] (in Kazakh)
25. Turehanova, R.A., Anesova, U.G. (2021) Qazіrgі qazaq qogamyndagy er-zhіgіttіng rolі men bejnesі. Habarshy. Filologija serijasy. №2(182). B. 74-85. [Turekhanova, R.A., Anesova, U.G. (2021) The role and image of a man in modern Kazakh society. Bulletin. Philology Series. No.2 (182). P. 74-85.] (in Kazakh)
26. Zhel'vis V.I. Materjatsja vse?! ... Rol' brani v istorii mirovoj civilizacii. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo AST, 251 s. [Zhelvis, V.I. (2022) Does everyone swear?! The role of swear words in the history of world civilization. AST Publishing House. 251 p.] (in Russian)
Review
For citations:
Mettibayeva S., Baissydyk I., Dossymbekova R. The Role of Invective Vocabulary in Speech Etiquette among the Youth of Kazakhstan. Tiltanym. 2025;100(4):224-238. https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2025-4-224-238
JATS XML









