TERMS AND METHODS USED IN FORENSIC LINGUISTICS AND DUTIES OF THE EXPERT

In the research, forensic linguistics was considered as a young branch of linguistics. In modern science, it is very important to reveal the paradigmatic essence of the science of linguistic expertise. The paper examines the scientific apparatus of forensic linguistics of a new direction in general linguistics, the names of concepts characteristic of this field, and describes the conclusions of research scholars who have studied it. The analysis of some judicial expert processes is also carried out. It is known that forensic linguistics began to form at the junction of language and law as a new area of expertise. This field of science is becoming very important and relevant due to the lack of a system of linguistic and legal concepts and its unified terminology and the high demand for theoretical and applied linguistics. Until the present, no comparative analysis of the subject and the subject of the study of judicial linguistics and speech education in court has been conducted. Therefore, this study creates prerequisites for the formation of the theory of Kazakh forensic linguistics based on theoretical conclusions in linguistics. Investigations on the intersection of interdisciplinary sciences open up new facets of the field of pragmalinguistics of linguistics and contributes to the deepening of knowledge.

1. Golev N. D. (1999) Postanovka problem na styke yazyka i prava [Statement of problems at the intersection of language and law] // Yurislingvistika: mezhvuz. sb. nauch. tr. Barnaul: Izd-vo Alt. un-ta, 1999. Vyp. 1. Problemy i perspektivy. S. 12- 59. (in Russian)

2. Dudareva YA.A. (2014) Lingvisticheskaya ekspertiza tovarnykh znakov. [Linguistic examination of trademarks] – Kemerovo: Kemerov. gos. un-t, 2014. – 203 s. (in Russian)

3. Zharkynbekova Sh. K, Nurtazina M. B., Syzdykova G. (2019) Zan linguistikasi. [Linguistics of law] – Nur-sultan, L. N. Gumilyov atyndagy EҦU, 2019. – 298 b. (in Kazakh)

4. Izotova T.M., Kuznetsov V.O., Plotnikova A.M. (2016) Metodika provedeniya sudebnoy lingvisticheskoy ekspertizy po delam ob oskorblenii [Methodology forensic linguistic expertise in cases of insult] (// Teoriya i praktika sudebnoy ekspertizy v sovremennykh usloviyakh №1(41), 2016. S. 92- 98. in Russian)

5. Karymsakova R.D., Li V.S. (2013) Oskorblenie i kleveta: vzglyad eksperta [Insults and slander: an expert's perspective] / Otv. red. G.H. Azhenova — Almaty: «Adil soz», – 2013. – 152 s. (in Russian)

6. Qazaq tilinin sozdigi (1999) [Dictionary of the Kazakh language] –Almaty: Dayk-Pres, 1999. – 774 b. (in Kazakh)

7. Orazbayeva A.S. (2017) Aleumettіk tіldіk qaqtygystardy retteudegі lingvistikalyq saraptama qyzmetіnіn rolі [The role of linguistic expertise in the regulation of socio-linguistic conflicts] // SH. Ualihanov atyndagy Kokshetau memlekettіk universitetіnіn habarshysy. Filologiya seriyasy. №1, 2017. – 118-123 b. (in Kazakh)

8. Plotnikova A.M. (2017) Konfliktnaya kommunikatsiya v aspekte sudebnoy lingvistiki. [Conflict communication in the aspect of forensic linguistics – Yekaterinburg: TKHT, 2017. – 197 s.] (in Russian)

9. Podkatilina M. L. (2013) Sudebnaya lingvisticheskaya ekspertiza ekstremistskikh materialov. [Forensic linguistic examination of extremist materials] – Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2013. – 184 s. (in Russian)

10. Tausogarova A.Q. (2017a) Sot-lingvistikalyq saraptama zhane kognitivtіk lingvistika gylymi apparatynyn sozdіgі [Dictionary of the scientific apparatus of forensic linguistic expertise and cognitive linguistics] / qurast. A.Q. Tausogarova. - Almaty: Qazaq universitetі, 2017. – 60 b. (in Kazakh)

11. Tausogarova A.Q. (2017b) Lingvoqaqtygystanu negіzderі: oqu-adіstemelіk kuraly. [Fundamentals of Linguistics: educational and methodological manual] – Almaty: Qazaq universitetі, 2017. – 74 b. - Almaty: Kazakh university, 2017. – 74 p.] (in Kazakh)