THE LEVEL OF KNOWLEDGE OF THE CONCEPT IN MODERN TURKIC LANGUAGES (on the materials of the Kazakh, Turkish and Uzbek languages)

One of the priority tasks of modern linguistics and the humanities is the study of language in the framework of the anthropocentric paradigm. The purpose of this article is to determine the degree of study of the concept, which is the main unit of cognitive linguistics and cultural linguistics in modern Turkic languages (Kazakh, Turkish, Uzbek). The article also touches upon such a complex phenomenon as the concept sphere, which has a national character. The importance of the need for in-depth conceptual research in the comparative aspect of the Turkic languages (Kazakh, Turkish, Uzbek) is determined. Nowadays, fundamental research is carried out in the study of the concept in Kazakh and Uzbek linguistics, but Turkish linguistics cannot yet be included into this list. However, the issue of the theoretical study of the concept in the Turkic languages (Kazakh, Turkish and Uzbek) in general, diachronic and synchronic analysis of the structure of the concept, identification of the concepts of the ancient Turkic worldview found in the written heritage and the problem of the need of their comprehensive analysis were considered. The importance of supplementing the linguistic reservoir of Turkic languages (Kazakh, Turkish, Uzbek) with comparative research was identified. During the research, the works of domestic and foreign scientists were analyzed, works on the study of the concept and the concept sphere in modern Turkic languages (Kazakh, Turkish, Uzbek) were selected and the obtained scientific information was synthesized. Research on this direction in the Kazakh, Turkish and Uzbek linguistics has been classified. The results of the study are used in comparative research in the field of cognitive linguistics in the Turkic languages, giving lectures on the discipline of «Cognitive linguistics» for students and applicants of the specialty of philology and Turkic studies.

1. text: An Anthology] Pod obshch. red. V.P. Neroznaka. – M.: Academia. – S. 267-279. (in Russian)

2. Ashurova D.U. (2016) Razvitiye kognitivnoy lingvistiki v Uzbekistane. [Development of cognitive linguistics in Uzbekistan] Khorizhiy filologiya. ‒ №3. ‒ 56 str. (in Russian)

3. Galiyeva M.R. (2010) Verbalizatsiya kontseptosfery word/sўz/slovo v angliyskoy. uzbekskoy i russkoy yazykovykh kartinakh mira [Verbalization of the word/syz/word concept sphere in English, Uzbek and Russian language pictures of the world]. Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskaniye uchenoy stepeni kandidata filologicheskikh nauk. ‒ Tashkent. (in Russian)

4. Gizdatov G.G. (1997) Kognitivnyye modeli v rechevoy deyatelnosti [Cognitive models in speech activity]. ‒ Almaty: Gylym. (in Russian)

5. Zhamanbayeva K. (1998) Til koldanysynyn kognitivtik negizderi: emotsiya. simvol. tildik sana [Cognitive foundations of language use: emotion, symbol, language consciousness]. – Almaty: Gylym. – 140 b. (in Kazakh)

6. Islam A. (2004) Ulttyk madeniyet konteksindegi duniyenin tildik sureti [Language picture of the world in the context of national culture] (salystyrmaly-salgastyrmaly lingvo-madeni saraptama): filol.gyl.dok. diss. – Almaty. – 228 b. 6. 213 b. (in Kazakh)

7. Kubryakova E.S., Demiankov V.Z., Pankrats Yu. G., Luzina L.G. (1996) Kratkiy slovar kognitivnykh terminov [A concise dictionary of cognitive terms]. – M. (in Russian) Lyapin S.Kh., Karasik V.I. (1997) Kontseptologiya: k stanovleniyu podkhoda [Conceptology: towards the formation of an approach.]. – M., 115 s. 45 b. (in Russian)

8. Mankeyeva Zh.A. (2008) Kazak tilindegi etnomadeni ataulardyn tanymdyk negizderi [Cognitive foundations of ethnocultural names in the Kazakh language]. – Almaty: Zhіbek zholy. (in Kazakh)

9. Nasrullayeva N.Z. (2018) Formirovaniye gendernykh kontseptov v angliyskoy i uzbekskoy frazeologicheskikh kartinakh mira [Formation of gender concepts in English and Uzbek phraseological pictures of the world]. Avtoreferat dissertatsii doktora filologicheskikh nauk. – Tashkent. (in Russian)

10. Nurdauletova B.I. (2008) Zhyraular poetikasyndagy duniyenin kontseptualdyk beynesi [Conceptual picture of the world in the poetics of the ravines]: 10.02.02: filol. gyl. dok. ... dis. – Almaty. 2008. – 328 b. (in Kazakh)

11. Rakhmatova M.M. (2019) Ingliz. uzbek va tozhik milliy madaniyatida «guzallik» kontseptining lisoniy khususiyatlari filologiya fanlari buyicha [In English, Uzbek and Tajik national cultures, the concept of "gazallik" is considered as an independent language.]. Falsafa doktori (phd) dissertatsiyasi avtoreferati. – Bukhoro. (in Uzbek)

12. Ruziyeva S.A. (2020) «Oila» tushunchasi va uning ingliz va uzbek tillari madaniyatida aks etishi [The concept of "Family" and its reflection in the culture of English and Uzbek languages]. Filologiya fanlari buyicha falsafa doktori (phd) dissertatsiyasi avtoreferati. ‒ Samarqand. (in Uzbek)

13. Safarov Sh.S. (2006) Kognitiv tilshunoslik [Cognitive linguistics]. – Zhizzakh: Sangzor nashriyeti. (in Uzbek)

14. Teliya V.N. (1996) Russkaya frazeologiya: semanticheskiy. pragmaticheskiy i lingvokulturologicheskiy aspekty [Russian phraseology: semantic, pragmatic and linguoculturological aspects]. – M... – 215 s. 93 b. (in Russian)

15. Tіleuberdiyev B. (2007) Kazak onomastikasynyn lingvokontseptologiya negizderi [Fundamentals of linguoconceptology of Kazakh onomastics]. (in Kazakh)

16. Uali N. (2005) «Kamshy» kontseptisi [The concept of "whip"] Akademik Sh.Sh.Sarybayev zhane kazak til bilimi maseleleri. Khalykaralyk gylymi-teoriyalyk konferentsiyanyn materialdary. – Almaty: Dayk-Press. 2005. – 204-213 bb.. (in Kazakh)

17. Gardenfors P. (1999) Some tenets of cognitive semantics // Cognitive Semantics: Meaning and Cognition. Ed. Allwood J.. Gardenfors P. – Amsterdam. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 1999. – 201 p. (in English) Jiri Lukl, Wei-lun Lu (2020). The flow and structure of information in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistic Studies journal. V.7.2. – pp. 275-283. (in English)

18. Johnson M., Lakoff G. (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: the Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. – NY.: Basic Book. – 640 p. (in English)

19. Sweetser E. (1990) From etymology to pragmatics: metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 174 р. (in English)

20. Tarih Khan. Basic concepts in Linguistics (2018). (in English) TDK Eğitim Terimleri sözlüğü (1974). http://www.tdk.gov.tr 17.07.2021. (in Turkish)

21. Vardar, B. (2007). Açıklamalı Dilbilim Terimleri Sözlüğü [Explanatory Dictionary of Linguistic Terms]. ‒ İstanbul: Multilingual Yayınları. (in Turkish)