Representation of Time and Space Categories in Sociolinguistic Research

The study aims to identify and systematize the linguistic approaches and principles used to represent time and space categories in recent sociolinguistic research and to examine respondents’ perceptions of the sociolinguistic factors influencing language functioning and development. The article presents the results of an analytical review of linguistic approaches and principles underlying the representation of the categories of time and space in sociolinguistic studies published between 2024 and 2026, as well as the findings of an empirical study conducted in 2025-2026 among university teachers and master's students from the North Kazakhstan Region with the participation of several international scholars. The results of the literature review are systematized in a table, while the findings of the empirical study are presented in the form of diagrams and subjected to further analysis. The study employed the methods of analysis, synthesis, structuring, and generalization of both the data collected by the authors and the findings reported in previously published research. The results indicate that the majority of the fifty-two respondents prefer the diachronic approach as one of the principal approaches to conducting research. The respondents tend to take into account the relationship between language and social context and regard neologisms and borrowings as significant factors influencing language functioning. The authors conclude that, despite acknowledging the impact of language digitalization and artificial intelligence, the respondents continue to rely on the traditional historical (diachronic) perspective as one of the stable mental frameworks for conceptualizing time and space.

1. Best, J.V., Kahn, J.W. (2012) Research in Education. Boston: Pearson Education. (in English)

2. Brown, J.D. (2014) Research Methods for Applied Linguistics: Scope, Characteristics, and Standards. London: Routledge. (in English)

3. Collart, A. (2024) Mind your language and your cues when judging the past: conference proceedings. [S.l.]: Academia Sinica. URL: https://aymeric-collart.github.io/talks/ (in English)

4. de Saussure, F. (1983) Course in General Linguistics. London: Duckworth. (in English)

5. Eko, Sugiarto, I. Ketut, Suardana, Ni, Nyoman Ayu, Tri Hidayanti, Komang, Astiari. (2024) Systemic functional linguistic based on semantic web. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan. Pp. 465–479. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v7i11.6162 (in English)

6. Florenskij, P.A. (2002) Stat'i i issledovanija po istorii i filosofii iskusstva i arheologii. Moskva: Mysl'. 446 s. [Florensky, P.A. (2002) Articles and Research on the History and Philosophy of Art Archaeology. Moscow: Mysl. 446 p.] (in Russian)

7. Florenskij, P.A. (2009) Mnimosti v geometrii. Rasshirenie oblasti dvuhmernyh obrazov geometrii (opyt novogo istolkovanija mnimostej). Moskva: URSS. 69 s. [Florensky, P.A. (2009) The Imaginary in Geometry. Expansion of the Field of Two-Dimensional Images of Geometry. An Experiment in New Interpretation of Imaginaries. Moscow: URSS. 69 p.] (in Russian)

8. Fursova, I.N. (2013) Kognitivnyj podhod v perevodovedenii. Lingua Mobilis. No .6 (45). S. 66–73. [Fursova, I.N. (2013) Cognitive approach to translation. Lingua Mobilis. Pp. 66–73.] URL: https://elibrary.ru/rictaa (in Russian)

9. Hasanova, K.N. (2022) Historical-comparative linguistic analysis of the reduction principle in prose texts. Path of Science. Pp. 4017–4022. URL: https://pathofscience.org/index.php/ps/article/view/1243 (in English)

10. Ivanov, V.V. (2023) Razvitie teoreticheskih principov issledovanija jazykovogo landshafta v kontekste gorodskogo mnogojazychija. Polilingvial'nost' i transkul'turnye praktiki. T. 20. No.3. S. 426–435. [Ivanov, V.V. (2023) Development of theoretical principles for the study of the linguistic landscape in the context of urban multilingualism. Polylinguality and Transcultural Practices. Vol. 20. No.3. Pp. 426–435.] https://doi.org/10.22363/2618-897X-2023-20-3-426-435 (in Russian)

11. Krivoruchko, A.I., Kan, Sin'yun'. (2024) Lingvotopologicheskoe modelirovanie processa perevoda: k obshchim osnovanijam. Virtual'naja kommunikacija i social'nye seti. T. 3. No.4. S. 309–315. [Krivoruchko, A.I., Kan S. (2024) Modeling the linguistic topology of translation process: general principles. Virtual Communication & Social Networks. Vol. 3. No. 4. Pp. 309–315.] https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-4799-2024-3-4-309-315 (in Russian)

12. Lozowski, P. (2023) In search of panchrony: Saussure versus cognitive linguistics. Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature. Vol. 47. No. 2. Pp. 153–164. https://doi.org/10.17951/lsmll.2023.47.2.153-164 (in English)

13. Malahova, V.L. (2021) Dinamiko-sistemnye principy sinergetiki v funkcional'noj lingvistike. Filologicheskie nauki v MGIMO. T. 7. No.3. S. 24–33. [Malakhova, V.L. (2021) Dynamic-and-systematic principles of synergetics in functional linguistics. Philology at MGIMO. Vol. 7. No. 3. Pp. 24–33]. https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2021-3-24-33 (in Russian)

14. McEnery, T., Brezina, V. (2022) The Fundamental Principles of Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107110625 (in English)

15. Pandey, G.P. (2024) Foundations and frameworks of ELT and applied linguistics research: principles, processes and practices. International Journal of Social Sciences and Management. Pp. 126–135. https://doi.org/10.3126/ijssm.v11i4.70984 (in English)

16. Vakhovska, O. (2024) The continuity of panchrony in modern linguistics. International Humanitarian University Herald. Philology. Pp. 29–34. https://doi.org/10.32782/2409-1154.2024.68.7 (in English)

17. Wu, Chenghui. (2023) Book review: The Fundamental Principles of Corpus Linguistics. Tony McEnery and Vaclav Brezina. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. Pp. 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqad031 (in English)