Linguistic Motivations of Polysemy in the Kazakh Language: Continuity between Historical Texts and Contemporary Usage
https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2026-3-84-99
Abstract
The article examines the linguistic motivations of polysemy in Kazakh by tracing continuity between historical texts and present‐day usage․ The study is relevant because polysemous lexemes attested in medieval Turkic written monuments are often perceived by contemporary readers as having a single meaning‚ which leaves the motivation and developmental trajectory of their senses insufficiently explained․ The aim of the research is to identify the semantic structure of polysemous units on the basis of two monuments from the Golden Horde period and to demonstrate their links to modern dictionary descriptions and functional activity in contemporary Kazakh․ The objectives include selecting polysemous lexemes from historical texts‚ clarifying sense branches through contextual analysis‚ characterizing the cognitive and functional grounds of semantic extension‚ and comparing the results with modern explanatory lexicography․ The empirical basis comprises the dictionary‚ transcription‚ and translation of Sayf Sarai’s “Gulistan bit‐turki” and Qutb’s “Khusrau wa Shirin”․ To align historical meanings with current usage‚ the study draws on a one‐volume comprehensive explanatory dictionary of Kazakh and the Universal Electronic Dictionary of the Kazakh language․ Methodologically‚ the research integrates historical‐comparative and contextual‐semantic analysis‚ classification of sense branches as lexico‐semantic variants‚ and a combined motivation‐based and lexicographic comparative approach․ As a result, the main motivational models of polysemy were systematized, while the preservation and extension of meanings, as well as changes in their usage, were substantiated through historical sources and the contemporary lexical system. The study’s scholarly contribution lies in substantiating a diachronic‐synchronic framework for explaining polysemy‚ while its practical value concerns teaching historical texts‚ improving lexicographic work‚ and enriching semantic resources for national language models․
About the Authors
N. MamashevaKazakhstan
Nurgul Mamasheva‚ Corresponding Author‚ Doctoral Student
Almaty
D. Kulmamatov
Uzbekistan
Dusmamat Kulmamatov‚ Doctor of Philological Sciences‚ Professor
Tashkent
B. Kurmanova
Kazakhstan
Bibigul Kurmanova
Uralsk
References
1. Ahanov‚ K. (2015) Til bilimining negizderi. Almaty: Olke. 560 b. [Akhanov‚ K. (2015) Foundations of Linguistics. Almaty: Olke. 560 p.] (in Kazakh)
2. Amanzholov‚ S. (2008) Qazaq adebi tili sintaksisining qysqasha kursy. Pavlodar: Pavlodar memlekettik universiteti. 110 b. [Amanzholov‚ S. (2008) A Short Course on the Syntax of the Kazakh Literary Language. Pavlodar: Pavlodar State University. 110 p.] (in Kazakh)
3. Haber‚ J.‚ Poesio‚ M. (2024❩ Polysemy-Evidence from linguistics‚ behavioral science‚ and contextualized language models. Computational Linguistics. No.50. Pp. 351-417. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00500 (in English)
4. Leshheva‚ L. (2014) Leksicheskaja polisemija v kognitivnom aspekte. Moskva: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul`tury. 253 s. [Leshcheva, L. (2014) Lexical Polysemy in the Cognitive Aspect. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskoy Kultury. 253 p.] (in Russian)
5. Liang‚ X.‚ Huang‚ F. (2024) Brain representations of lexical ambiguity: Disentangling homonymy‚ polysemy‚ and their meanings. Brain and Language. No.4. Pp. 105-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2024.105426 (in English)
6. Malbaqov‚ M.‚ Qajrat‚ A. (2025) XVIII – XX gasyrlardagy qazaq sozdikterine engen leksikadagy tarihi sozdik qor quramy. Tiltanym, No.4 (100). 12-21-bb. [Malbakov‚ M.‚ Kairat‚ A. (2025) The Composition of the Historical Lexical Stock in the Vocabulary Included in Kazakh Dictionaries of the 18th-20th Centuries. Tiltanym, No.4 (100). Pp. 12-21.] https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2025-4-12-21 (in Kazakh)
7. Mamyrbek‚ G. (2024) Qutbtyng «Husrau ua Shyryn» dastany: sozdigi‚ transkripcijasy‚ audarmasy. Almaty: Asyl ZhK. 810 b. [Mamyrbek‚ G. (2024) Kutb’s “Khusrau wa Shirin”: Dictionary‚ Transcription‚ and Translation. Almaty: Asyl ZhK. 810 p.] (in Kazakh)
8. Martínez‚ I.‚ Carrión‚ D. (2024) A multimodal approach to polysemy: The senses of touch. Language and Cognition. No.16. Pp. 1697-1717 https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2024.23 (in English)
9. Musabaev‚ G. (2008) Qazaq til bilimining maseleleri. Almaty: Arys. 472 b. [Musabayev‚ G. (2008) Issues of Kazakh Linguistics. Almaty: Arys. 472 p.] (in Kazakh)
10. Pashan‚ D. (2024) Bir buyndy kopmagynaly sozderding leksika-semantikalyq sipaty. Almaty: El-shezhire. 224 b. [Pashan‚ D. (2024) The Lexico-Semantic Characteristics of Monosyllabic Polysemous Words. Almaty: El-shejire. 224 p.] (in Kazakh)
11. Potebnja‚ A. (1993) Mysl` i jazyk. Moskva: Sinto. 189 s. [Potebnya‚ A. (1993) Thought and Language. Moscow: Sinto. 189 p.] (in Russian)
12. Qajdar‚ A. (2004) Turkitanuga kirispe. Almaty: Arys. 360 b. [Qaidar‚ A. (2004) Introduction to Turkology. Almaty: Arys. 360 p.] (in Kazakh)
13. Qaliev‚ G.‚ Bolganbaev‚ A. (2006) Qazirgi qazaq tilining leksikologijasy men frazeologijasy. 3-bas. Almaty: Sozdik- Slovar`. 258 b. [Kaliyev‚ G.‚ Bolganbayev‚ A. (2006) Lexicology and Phraseology of the Modern Kazakh Language (3rd ed.). Almaty: Sozdik–Slovar. 258 p.] (in Kazakh)
14. Qazaq sozdigi (Qazaq tilining birtomdyq ulken tusindirme sozdigi) (2013). Almaty: Dauir. 1488 b. [Kazakh Dictionary (One-Volume Comprehensive Explanatory Dictionary of the Kazakh Language) (2013). Almaty: Dauir. 1488 p.] (in Kazakh)
15. Qazaq tilining ambebap jelektrondy sozdigi (TBI Sozdik). [Universal Electronic Dictionary of the Kazakh Language (TBI Sozdik).] (Accessed: 13 March 2026‚ https://tbisozdik.kz/) (in Kazakh)
16. Ritchie‚ K.‚ Prasada‚ S. (2024❩ Explaining systematic polysemy: Kinds and individuation. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy. No.1 (201). Pp. 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2024.2387276 (in English)
17. Sejitbekova‚ A. (2024) Sejf Sarajding «Gulistan bit-turki» zhazba eskertkishi: sozdigi‚ transkripcijasy‚ audarmasy. Almaty: Asyl ZhK. 704 b. [Seitbekova‚ A. (2024) Sayf Sarai’s “Gulistan bit-turki” Written Monument: Dictionary‚ Transcription‚ and Translation. Almaty: Asyl ZhK. 704 p.] (in Kazakh)
18. Sherba‚ L.V. (2004) Jazykovaja sistema i rechevaja dejatel`nost`. Izd. 2-e. Moskva: Editorial URSS. 432 s. [Shcherba‚ L.V. (2004) The Language System and Speech Activity (2nd ed.). Moscow: Editorial URSS. 432 p.] [in Russian)
19. Ufimceva‚ A. (1968) Leksicheskoe znachenie. Moskva: Nauka. 239 s. [Ufimtseva‚ A. (1968) Lexical Meaning. Moscow: Nauka. 239 p.] (in Russian)
20. Zvegincev‚ V. (1973) Jazyk i lingvisticheskaja teorija. Moskva: Nauka. 315 s. [Zvegintsev‚ V. (1973) Language and Linguistic Theory. Moscow: Nauka. 315 p.] (in Russian)
Review
For citations:
Mamasheva N., Kulmamatov D., Kurmanova B. Linguistic Motivations of Polysemy in the Kazakh Language: Continuity between Historical Texts and Contemporary Usage. Tiltanym. 2026;(3):84-99. (In Kazakh) https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2026-3-84-99
JATS XML










