Preview

Tiltanym

Advanced search

Distinctive Onomastic Features in Kazakhstani and British Discourse

https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2026-2-223-237

Abstract

The current paper analyzes the linguistic features of onomastic units such as homoanthroponyms, toponyms, and homonyms in the news discourse of Kazakhstan and the UK. The source of data used in this analysis includes headlines, news articles, and briefs by reputable mass-media organizations like “Khabar”, “24 Kazakhstan”, “KazTAG”, “The Times”, “The Guardian”, “The Independent”, “The Daily Telegraph”, and “The Observer”. In particular, the paper analyzes the way onomastic units help to fulfill certain pragmatic purposes under socio-cultural and linguistic context conditions. Several findings have been reached during the investigation. First, in news discourses of Kazakhstan and the UK, polysemantic items (onomoanthroponyms, onomotoponyms, and occasionally onomophytonyms) are employed to develop language games in order to enhance the stylistic impact and pragmatic function of the text. These differences demonstrate that name structures differ substantially; where Kazakhstani mass media use formalistic and explicit multicomponent naming systems with the usage of markers of professions and adjectives, British analogues show preferences for concise twocomponent structures and apply different types of nicknames, metaphors, and symbols, including derogatory political ones and cultural signs. Findings also indicate that in Kazakhstani and the UK news discourses, polysemantic onomastic units such as proper names, anthroponyms, and occasionally toponyms are used to create language games that enhance stylistic expression and pragmatic function. Notably, Kazakhstani media tend to favour formalistic, multicomponent naming systems with markers of profession and adjectives, whereas British media prefer concise, two-component structures, employing nicknames, metaphors, and symbols including derogatory political references and cultural signs. These findings show the significance of the use of toponymic and political names as cultural symbols, carrying with them meanings relating to power, nationalism, ideologies, and politics. The authors conclude that this helps not only in linguistic analysis but also in intercultural communication studies and the development of toponymic dictionaries.

About the Authors

J. Hou
Xi'an International Studies University
China

Jianbo Hou, Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Professor

Xi'an



R. Saurbayev
Toraighyrov University
Kazakhstan

Rishat Saurbayev, Candidate of Philological Sciences, Professor

Pavlodar



F. Yerekhanova
Central Asian Innovation University
Kazakhstan

Fatima Yerekhanova, Corresponding Author, Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor

Shymkent



References

1. Abu, A., Saurbayev, R., Altynbekova, Pogozheva, Yerekhanova, F., Agalieva, N., Omarov, N. (2024) Role of Code Switching and Componential Analysis in Conflictogeme Transfer in English, Russian, and Kazakh Media. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 10(3). Pp. 230-244. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.32601/ejal.10321 (in English)

2. Bakhytzhanova, A., Bekmukhambetova, S.B., Utemissova, E.K., Zhanzhigitov, S. (2025) Linguo-Conceptual and Linguocultural Analysis of the Concept “Memory”: Semantic Typology of Kazakh-Russian-English Phraseology. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 15(12). Pp. 4162-4171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1512.36 (in English)

3. Campbell, B. (2013) Onomastics: The study of names. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (in English)

4. Dalkɪlɪç, O.V. (2025) Derivatives of the Anthroponym Yesenin. Issues of Onomastics. Vol. 22(1). Pp. 298-318.] https://doi.org/10.15826/vopr_onom.2025.22.1.013 (in English)

5. Dossanova, A.M., Maral, A.M., Sharshova, R.N. (2025) Linguopragmatic features of the discourse markers. Bulletin of KazUIR and WL named after Abylai Khan. Almaty. No. 3(78). Pp. 186-200. DOI: https://doi%20org/10.32523/2616-678X-2025-153-4-62-74 (in English)

6. Karibekova, А., Turarova, А. (2025) Kazakh language and Briticism. Izvestija KazUMOiMja imeni Abylaj hana. No. 3(78). S. 186-200. [Karibekova, А., Turarova, А. (2025) Kazakh language and Briticism. News of KazUIR and WL named after Abylai Khan, Almaty. No. 3(78). Pp. 186-200.] DOI: https://doi.org/10.48371/PHILS (in English)

7. Martynenko, I.A. (2020) On the term “cognitive toponymy”. Russian Linguistic Bulletin. 3(23). https://doi.org/10.18454/RULB.2020.23.3.15 (in English)

8. Mensah, E.O. (2024) Name This Child: Religious Identity and Ideology in Tiv Personal Names. A JOURNAL OF ONOMASTICS. 72(4). Pp. 12-23. DOI: 10.5195/names.2024.2716 (in English)

9. Nurekenova, A.D., Amirov, A.Zh., Tleulesova, A.Sh. (2025) Issledovanie onomasticheskih nazvanij v period nezavisimogo Kazahstana. Tiltanym. No. 100(4). Almaty. S. 70-80. [Nurekenova, A.D., Amirov, A.Zh., Tleulesova, A.Sh. (2025) A study of onomastic names during the period of independent Kazakhstan. Tiltanym. Almaty. No. 100(4). Pp. 7080.]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2025-4-70-80 (in Russian)

10. Onalbayeva, A., Zhumagulova, B., Toktarova, T., Aliyeva, D., Kadyrov, Z., Yesmatova, M. (2024) Linguocultural Aspects of the Concept of “Qonaqjailylyq” (Hospitality). Forum for Linguistic Studies. 6(6). Pp. 1123–1137. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i6.7694 (in English)

11. Schaefer, W. (2010) Onomastics: Classification and Structural Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Publishing. (in English)

12. Shakirova, T., Zhumagulova, Zh., Abitiyarova, A., Botabayeva, Zh. (2026) Semantics and Functions of Anthroponyms in the Kazakh Heroic Epic “Koblandy Batyr”. International Journal of Society, Culture, & Language. 14(1). https://doi.org/10.22034/ijscl.2025.2073192.4220 (in English)

13. Sujunbaeva, A.Zh., Shelestjuk, E.V., Pitina, S.A. (2025) Lingvokul'turologicheskij podhod k analizu obraza grazhdanina. Tiltanym. Almaty. No.100(4). S. 180-195. [Suyunbayeva, A.Zh., Shelestyuk, E.V., Pitina, S.A. (2025) A linguocultural approach to the analysis of the image of a citizen. Tiltanym. Almaty. No. 100(4). Pp. 180-195.] DOI: https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2025-4-180-195 (in Russian)

14. Sunand, Y., Jiang, X. (2023) An Exploration of River Names in China. A JOURNAL OF ONOMASTICS. 71(1). DOI 10.5195/names.2023.2410 (in English)

15. Voronichev, O.E. (2016) O tipah i stilisticheskih kachestvah onomasticheskih dominant kalambura. Ural'skij filologicheskij vestnik. T. 2. S. 74-82. [Voronichev, O.E. (2016) On the types and stylistic qualities of onomastic dominants of puns. Ural Philological Bulletin, Uralsk. Vol. 2. Pp. 74-82.] (in Russian)

16. Yerekhanova, F.T., Satylkhanova, G.A., Zhorabekova, A.N. (2023) Brief characteristics of proper names. BULLETIN of the Eurasian National University. Philology series, Astana. №145 (4). Pp. 19-34.] DOI: https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-678X-2023-145-4-19-34 (in English)

17. Yuti, Islamiyah, H., Hermaliza, H. (2024) Teun A Van Dijk's critical discourse analysis on kompas.com news language literacy. Journal of Linguistics Literature and Language Teaching. 8(1). Pp. 463-476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v8i1.9280 (in English)


Review

For citations:


Hou J., Saurbayev R., Yerekhanova F. Distinctive Onomastic Features in Kazakhstani and British Discourse. Tiltanym. 2026;(2):223-237. https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2026-2-223-237

Views: 10

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2411-6076 (Print)
ISSN 2709-135X (Online)