PROSODIC FEATURES OF SPEECH IN ENGLISH AND KAZAKH LANGUAGES

This article discusses the challenges of identifying and describing prosodic characteristics in languages of different types, such as Kazakh and English. It explores the specific features of native language prosody that arise from the interaction of phonetic systems of both native and non-native languages in the speech of bilingual speakers learning a foreign language in academic settings. The prosodic organization of syntagms, which are semantic-intonational and grammatical units of speech, is examined in detail. The research reveals that the syntagm plays a crucial role in describing suprasegmental features of speech, and its prosodic properties depend on the phonetic structure of each language. Differences in the perception of stress in different segments of speech indicate varying functional significance of stress in the systems of Kazakh and English languages. The study utilizes structural analysis of intonation and is descriptive in nature, incorporating analysis of relevant scientific literature on the research topic. This analysis serves as the basis for an in-depth study of the differences between the prosodic structures of the Kazakh and English languages.

1. Bazarbaeva, Z.M., Kozhamsugirova, B.O. (2022) Problemy prosodii i zvuchashhchego diskursa v anglijskom jazyke. Tiltanym, №185(1), S. 3-14. https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2022-1-3-14 [Bazarbayeva, Z.M., Kozhamsugirova, B.O. (2022) Problems of prosody and sounding discourse in English language. Tiltanym, No. 185(1), P. 3-14. https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2022-1-3-14] (in Russian)

2. Chekharin E.E. (2016) Metody i algoritmy interpretacii informacii. Obrazovatelnye resursy i tekhnologii, №5(17). [Chekkharin Y.Y. (2016) Methods and algorithms of information interpretation. Educational resources and technologies, Nо. 5(17).] (in Russian)

3. Ergesh B., Bekmanova G., Sharipbai A. (2019) Analiz tonalnosti kazahskogo teksta i ego poljarnost`. V: Vebintellekt. №17(1), S. 9-15. [Yergesh B., Bekmanova G., Sharipbai A. (2019) Sentiment analysis of Kazakh text and their polarity. In Web Intelligence, Nо. 17(1), P. 9-15.] (in Russian)

4. Hasenov A. (1996) Tilbilimi. Almaty: Sanat. 215 s. [Khassenov A. (1996) Tіlbіlіmі. Almaty: Sanat. 215 p.] (in Kazakh)

5. Iskakova G.N., Orazbekova I.G., Dosybaeva G.K. (2022) Intonaciya anglijskogo i kazahskogo jazykov. Dostupno po ssylke: https://pps.kaznu.kz/ru/Main/FileShow2/16306/116/3/7806/2013// (data prinjatija: 12.10.2022) [Iskakova.G.N, Orazbekova I.G., Dossybayeva G.K. (2022) Intonation od English and Kazakh languages. Available at: https://pps.kaznu.kz/ru/Main/FileShow2/16306/116/3/7806/2013// (data accepted: 12.10.2022)] (in Russian)

6. Koul Dzh. (2015) Prosodija v kontekste: obzor. jazyk, kognitivnye nauki i neironauki, №30(1-2), S. 1-31. [Cole J. (2015) Prosody in context: a review. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, Nо. 30(1-2), P. 1-31.] (in Russian)

7. Kusainova R., Kusainova A. (2022) Osobennosti intonacii kazakhskoj i anglijskoj rechi. Dostupno po ssylke: http://oldconf.neasmo.org.ua/node/1410 (data priniatiia: 12.10.2022). [Kusainova, R., Kusainova A. (2022) Features of the intonation of Kazakh and English speech. Available at: http://oldconf.neasmo.org.ua/node/1410 (data accepted: 12.10.2022)] (in Russian)

8. Qaraev M.A. (1993) Qazaq tili. Almaty: Anatili. 220 s. [Karayev M.A. (1993) Kazakh tili. Almaty: Ana tili. 220 p.] (in Kazakh)

9. Vasser Zh. (1983) Nezavisimye ot jazyka prosodicheskie priznaki. V: Zh. Vaisser Prosodiia: modeli i izmerenija. Springer-Verlag, S. 53-66. [Vaissiere, J. (1983) Language Independent Prosodic Features. J. Vaissiere Prosody: Models and Measurements. Springer-Verlag, P. 53-66.] (in Russian)