FEATURES OF STABLE COMBINATIONS WITH NUMERALS IN THE KAZAKH LANGUAGE

The meaning of stable expressions of a language is often understandable to a person who speaks that language. However, the form and content are not always clear even to those who know their native language. After all, constant phrases, proverbs-sayings are the fruits of a long era. The semantic, symbolic nature of numerals as part of stable phrases and proverbs of the language, as well as the reason for their use as part of stable phrases have much in common with incomprehensible to the people.The fate of the language is connected with the history of the nation. Customs, traditions, social status, cultural level of the people are reflected in the language of this people. Due to the fact that the formation of numerals as part of stable expressions in our language is a historical category, we can say linguistic data reflecting the realities of life, customs, economic, living conditions of past eras.Stable expressions occupy a special place in Kazakh linguistics. By their nature, phraseological units are studied lexically, etymologically, morphologically, syntactically, stylistically, cognitively. However, there are many points that have yet to be explored. One of them is numerals as part of stable phrases in our language, the definition of their semantic, etymological, stylistic, grammatical aspects. The specificity of the topic that becomes the object of research work is that it is connected with the history of the creation of stable expressions

1. Avakova P. (2002) Phraseological semantics. – Almaty: «Kazakh University», 2002, –253 b.

2. Bashmakova I.G., A.P.Yushkevich. (1951) The origin of number systems. In the book: Encyclopedia of Elementary Mathematics, – Moscow, 1951

3. Zhautikov O. (1956a) Zhai sanaudan mashinalyk matematikaga zhetu. – Almaty: Kazmembas, 1956 – 248 b.

4. Zhautikov O.A. (1975b) Akikatty tanyp-biludegi matematikanyn roli. – Almaty, 1975, – 308 b.

5. Kenesbayev I. (1946) Zheti, ush, togyz, kyrykpen baylanysty ugymdar. // Kazakh SSR GA khabary. 1946, Almaty, philol. Episode 4/26 shygaryluy

6. Kenzheakhmetuly S. (1998) Ulttyk adet-guryptyn beimalim 220 turi. – Almaty: Sanat, 1998

7. Levitskaya L.S. (1976) Historical morphology of the Chuvash language. – M., 1976

8. Levi-Bruhl L. (1930) Primitive thinking. – Moscow: «Atheist», 1930, –344 p.

9. Malov S.E. (1951) The Yenisei writing of the Turks. Texts and translations. – M.–L., 1951

10. Panfilov V.Z. (1982) Epistemological aspects of philosophical problems of linguistics. – Moscow: Nauka, 1982, – 357 p.

11. Psyanchin V.S. (1981) The name is a numeral. In the book: Gr.modern Bashkir lit. language. – M., 1981

12. Ramstedt G. (1957) Introduction to Altai Linguistics. – Moscow, 1957

13. Tomanov M. (1973) San esimder tarikhynan. Zhinakta: Kazak tili men adebieti. – Almaty, 1973, 3-shyguy

14. Taylor E. (1936) Primitive culture. – Moscow, 1939, –568 p.

15. Tenishev E.R. (1974a) Turkic «one», «two», «three». // Turkological collection, 1974, M., 1975, 104 p.

16. Tazhiev K. (2004) Kieli sandardyk genesis zhane epicalyk zhyrlar men zhyraular poeziyasyndagi korkemdik kyzmeti. Turkistan, 2004

17. Tanishev E.P. (2002b) Comparative historical grammar of the Turkic languages. – Moscow: Nauka, 2002, – 769 p.

18. Ualiev N. (1988) Zhumbak sandar // «Zhalyn» journal, 1988, No.4, 103-107 рр.

19. Yskakov M. (1966) Turki tildes halyktardyn yezhelgi arithmetikas. Kitapta: Ezhelgi madeniyet kualary. – Almaty, 1966, – 350 b.