Preview

Anthropocentric Paradigms of Scientific Knowledge in the Works of A. Baitursynuly: Language as a Tool and Weapon

https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2025-2-12-27

Abstract

The article deals with the actual problem of paradigm and paradigm of scientific knowledge, anthropocentrism, their place and significance in the scientific heritage of A. Baitursynuly. The concept of paradigm and the term paradigm in the works of A. Baitursynuly is studied from three scientific positions: from the position of F. Sossyur (paradigm is a kind of grammatical or other form of a linguistic unit); from the position of T. Kuhn (paradigm is a kind of grammatical or other form of a linguistic unit). Kuhn (paradigm is an epoch, a significant period of time in the life of science, at which it has obtained significant results in its development); the place and meaning of the concept of paradigm, paradigm of scientific knowledge in the studies of A. Baitursynuly (comparative-historical, system-structural, anthropocentric). In the course of scientific search the work was carried out, the results of which show that in the scientific heritage of A. Baitursynuly the works that are made in accordance with the modern understanding of the paradigm of scientific knowledge are clearly presented. A. Baitursynuly introduced the notion and scientific concept of ‘til – qural’ (language – tool), ‘til – qaru’ (language – weapon) in 1914, at the same time naming his textbooks on the Kazakh language in Arabic script. In Eurasian linguistics (for example, in Russian), the approach to the concept of “language – tool, language – weapon” in the corresponding terms started from the late XX and early XXI century (V.A. Maslova, N.G. Ter-Minasova, etc.). Linguistic and linguomethodological heritage of A. Baitursynuly built on the concepts of anthropocentrism, anthropocentric paradigm of scientific knowledge, subdividing into universal (universal) and Kazakh national-cultural, but considers it as a whole consisting of two aspects, which is confirmed by a large amount of relevant linguistic material. The use of semantic, comparative, linguistictheoretical, inductive, deductive and other research methods in the course of scientific research served as the basis for revealing the theoretical and practical significance of the work. 

About the Author

M. Dzhusupov
Uzbek State University of World Languages
Uzbekistan
Mahanbet Dzhusupov,  Doctor of Philological Sciences, Professor

Tashkent



References

1. Alefirenko, N.F. (2005) Sovremennye problemy nauki o jazyke. Moskva: Flinta. 416 s. [Alefirenko, N. F. (2005) Modern Problems of the Science of Language. Moscow: Flinta. 416 p.] (in Russian)

2. Antropocentrizm v jazyke i kul`ture (2017). Moskva: Indrik, 264 s. [Anthropocentrism in Language and Culture. (2017) Moscow: Indrik, 264 p.] (in Russian)

3. Baitursynov, A. (1925) Til – qural (dybys jujesı men turleri). 1-shi til tanytqysh kitap. Qyzyl-Orda. In A.Baytursynov (Red.) (1992) Til tagylymy (qazaq tili men oqu-agartuga qatysty engbekteri). B. 173-198. Almaty: Ana tili. [Baitursynov, A. (1925) Language Tool (sound system and types). First Language Introduction Book. Qyzyl-Orda. In A.Baytursynov (Ed.) (1992) Language Learning (works related to the Kazakh language and education). P. 173-198. Almaty: Ana tili.] (in Kazakh)

4. Baitursynov, A. (1991) Adebiet tanytqysh. A. Baitursynov (Red.) Aq zhol. P. 340-461. Almaty: Zhalyn. [Baytursynov, A. (1991) Introduction to Literature. A. Baitursynov (Ed.), Aq zhol. P. 340-461. Almaty: Zhalyn.] (in Kazakh)

5. Baitursynov, A. (1992) Til tagylymy (qazaq tili men oqu-agartuga qatysty engbekteri). Almaty: Ana tili, 447 b. [Baitursynov, A. (1992) Language Learning (works related to the Kazakh language and education). Almaty: Ana tili, 447 p.] (in Kazakh)

6. Baitursynuly, A. (1912) Oqu quraly. Qazaqsha alifba. 1 kitap. Orynbor. In A. Baitursynov (Red.) (1992) Til tagylymy (qazaq tili men oqu-agartuga qatysty engbekteri). P. 33-47. Almaty: Ana tili. [Baitursynuly, A. Teaching Aid. Kazakh Alphabet. First Book. Orynbor. In A. Baitursynov (Ed.) (1992) Language Learning (works related to the Kazakh language and education). P. 33-47. Almaty: Ana tili.] (in Kazakh)

7. Baitursynuly, A. (1914) Til – qural (qazaq tilining sarfy). Birinshi zhylgy. Orynbor, 1914. Baitursynuly, A. (1992) Til tagylymy (qazaq tili men oqu-agartuga qatysty engbekteri). Almaty: Ana tili. B. 141-171. [Baitursynuly, A. (1914) Language – Tool (Grammar of the Kazakh Language). First Year. Orynbor, 1914. Baitursynuly, A. (1992) Language Learning (works related to the Kazakh language and education). Almaty: Ana tili. P. 141-171.] (in Kazakh)

8. Bol`shoj tolkovyj slovar` russkogo jazyka (2002). Sankt-Peterburg: Norint, 536 s. [The Great Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language (2002). Saint Petersburg: Norint, 536 p.] (in Russian)

9. Bol`shoj jenciklopedicheskij slovar`. Jazykoznanie. (2000) Moskva: Bol`shaya Rossijskaja jenciklopedija, 687 s. [The Great Encyclopedic Dictionary. Linguistics. (2000) Moscow: Bolshaya Rossiyskaya enciklopediya, 687 p.] (in Russian)

10. Buranov, Dzh. (1983) Sravnitel`naja tipologija anglijskogo i tjurkskih jazykov. Moskva: Vysshaja shkola, 267 s. [Buranov, Dzh. (1983) Comparative Typology of English and Turkic Languages. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 267 p.] (in Russian)

11. Humboldt, W. (2000) Izbrannye trudy po jazykovedeniju. Per. s nem. Moskva: Progress, 400 s. [Humboldt, W. (2000) Selected Works on Linguistics. Transl. from German. Moscow: Progress, 400 p.] (in Russian)

12. Dzhusupov, M. (1995) Fonemografija A. Baitursynova i fonologija singarmonisma. Tashkent: Uzbekistan, 178 s. [Dzhusupov, M. (1995) Phonemography of A. Baitursynov and Phonology of Singarmonism. Tashkent: Uzbekistan, 178 p.] (in Russian)

13. Dzhusupov, M., Ibraimov, Q.Sh. (2015) Ahmet Baitursynuly: gylymtanym, terminzhasam, stilistika. Almaty: Alem. [Dzhusupov, M., Ibraimov, Q.Sh. (2015) Akhmet Baitursynuly: Scientific Study, Terminology, Stylistics. Almaty: Alem.] (in Kazakh)

14. Dzhusupov, N.M. (2019) Kognitivnaja stilistika: teorija i praktika, strategii vydvizhenija v hudozhestvennom tekste. Tashkent: VNESHINVESTPROM, 464 s. [Dzhusupov, N.M. (2019) Cognitive Stylistics: Theory and Practice, Strategies of Promotion in a Literary Text. Tashkent: VNESHINVESTPROM, 464 p.] (in Russian)

15. Dzhusupov, M. (2023) Antropocentrizm v triedinstve chelovek – jazyk – socium i ego vyrazhenie v poslovice. Inostrannye jazyki v Uzbekistane. (5)52. S. 122-142. [Dzhusupov, M. (2023) Anthropocentrism in the Trinity of Man – Language – Society and Its Expression in Proverbs. Foreign Languages in Uzbekistan. (5)52. P. 122-142.] (in Russian)

16. Dzhusupov, M. (2024) Poliaspektnyj harakter vyrazhenija antropocentrizma v poslovicah russkogo, kazakhskogo, uzbekskogo, anglijskogo jazykov. Tiltanym, No 3. S. 12-21. [Dzhusupov, M. (2024) Polyaspectual Nature of Expressing Anthropocentrism in Proverbs of Russian, Kazakh, Uzbek, English Languages. Tiltanym, No 3, P. 12-21.] (in Russian)

17. Kuhn, T. (1977) Struktura nauchnyh revoljucij. Moskva: Progress, 300 s. [Kuhn, T. (1977) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Moscow: Progress, 300 p.] (in Russian)

18. Maslova, V.A. (1997) Vvedenie v lingvokul`turologiju: uchebnoe posobie. Moskva: Nasledie, 206 s. [Maslova, V.A. (1997) Introduction to Linguoculturology: Study Guide. Moscow: Nasledie, 206 p.] (in Russian)

19. Maslova, V.A. (2008) Sovremennye napravlenija v lingvistike. Moskva: izd. centr Akademija, 272 s. [Maslova, V.A. (2008) Modern Directions in Linguistics. Moscow: Publishing Center Akademiya, 272 p.] (in Russian)

20. Popova, Z.D., Sternin, I.A. (2001) Ocherki po kognitivnoj lingvistike. Voronezh: Istoki, 191 s. [Popova, Z.D., Sternin, I.A. (2001) Essays on Cognitive Linguistics. Voronezh: Istoki, 191 p.] (in Russian)

21. Russko-kazahskij slovar` (2007) T. 2. Almaty, 635 s. [Russian-Kazakh Dictionary. (2007) Vol. 2. Almaty, 635 p.] (in Russian)

22. Saussure, F. (1933) Kurs obyсhnoj lingvistiki. Moskva: Logos, 296 s. [Saussure, F. (1933) Course in General Linguistics. Moscow: Logos, 296 p.] (in Russian)

23. Ter-Minasova, S.G. (1999) Jazyk kak orudie kul`tury. Moskva: MGU, 110 s. [Ter-Minasova, S.G. (1999) Language as a Tool of Culture. Moscow: MGU, 110 p.] (in Russian)

24. Ter-Minasova, S.G. (2008) Jazyk i mezhkul`turnaja kommunikacija: uchebnoe posobie (3-e izd.). Moskva: MGU, 352 s. [Ter-Minasova, S.G. (2008) Language and Intercultural Communication: Study Guide (3rd edition). Moscow: MGU, 352 p.] (in Russian)

25. Til bilimi sozdigi. (1998) Almaty: Gylym, 544 s. [Dictionary of Linguistics. (1998) Almaty: Gylym, 544 p.] (in Kazakh) Shcherba, L.V. (2008) Jazykovaja sistema i rechevaja dejatel`nost`. Moskva: izd. LKI, 432 s. [Shcherba, L.V. (2008) Language System and Speech Activity. Moscow: LKI Publ. house, 432 p.] (in Russian)

26. Yusupov, U.K. (2007) Teoreticheskie osnovy sopostavitel`noj lingvistiki. Tashkent: Fan, 126 s. [Yusupov, U.K. (2007) Theoretical Foundations of Comparative Linguistics. Tashkent: Fan, 126 p.] (in Russian)

27. Zhusipuly, M. (Dzhusupov M.) (1998) Ahmet Baitursynov zhane qazirgi qazaq tili fonologijasy. Almaty: Gylym, 218 b. [Zhusipuly, M. (Dzhusupov M.) (1998) Akhmet Baitursynov and Modern Kazakh Phonology. Almaty: Gylym, 218 p.] (in Kazakh)


Review

For citations:


Dzhusupov M. Anthropocentric Paradigms of Scientific Knowledge in the Works of A. Baitursynuly: Language as a Tool and Weapon. Tiltanym. 2025;(2):12-27. (In Kazakh) https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2025-2-12-27

Views: 14


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2411-6076 (Print)
ISSN 2709-135X (Online)