Verb Constructions in the Kazakh Language: Complex, Analytical or Serial?

The article proposes a new point of view on the grammatical status of analytical verb constructions in the Kazakh language, which is an agglutinative language. Traditionally, Kazakh language specialists qualified them as analytical constructions, and later they began to be defined as “compound verbs”. In our opinion, a significant portion of these constructions should be classified as serial verb constructions (SVCs). The theory of serial verb sequences was developed by D. Westermann in the early 20th century, based on the material of African languages. As arguments for this interpretation, their semantics are presented – denoting multiple actions as a “single event”, the absence of subordination or coordination between the verbs within the construction, a unified syntactic function, etc. In the Kazakh language, considering the semantic characteristics of the verbs within the construction, symmetric and asymmetric verb constructions are distinguished. In symmetric SVCs, the verbs are characterized by semantic and grammatical unrestriction. The sequence of verbs in them conveys the real temporal sequence of actions that constitute a single event. An asymmetric SVC consists of two verbs: one with a broad meaning and one with a narrow meaning. Additionally, we believe that mixed symmetric-asymmetric constructions also function in the Kazakh language. The status of serial verb constructions is reflected in the semantic and syntactic features of verb chains in the Kazakh language. Thus, in agglutinative languages, serial verb constructions function as a natural part of the grammatical system, demonstrating a syncretism of meaning within a segmented sequence of verb forms. 

1. Байыр-оол А. Тувинские глагольные конструкции с фрустративной семантикой. Сибирский филологический журнал. – 2023. № 2. – С. 235–247. Бapмeнқұлoвa A., Бecиpoв E., Mypcaл A. Қaзaқ тiлiндeгi eтicтiктi тұpaқты тipкecтepдiң лeкcикoгpaфиялaнуы. Тілтаным. – 2022. № 4(88). – Б. 3–14. https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2022-4-3-14

2. Баскаков Н.О категориях наклонений и времени в тюркских языках. В кн.: Структура и история тюркских языков. – Москва, 1971. – С. 72–80.

3. Гращенков П., Ермолаева М. О двойной природе тюркских конвербов. Вестник Московского университета. Серия 9. Филология. – 2015. №2. – С. 42–56.

4. Греймас А.-Ж. Французская семиотика: От структурализма к постструктурализму / Пер. с франц., сост., вступ. ст. Г.К. Косикова. – Москва: ИГ Прогресс, 2000. – С. 153–170.

5. Дерунова Е., Темиргазина З. Семиотическое прочтение стихотворения Олжаса Сулейменова "Хромой кулан". Тіл және әдебиет: теориясы мен тәжірибесі / Language and Literature: Theory and Practice / Язык и литература: теория и практика. – 2024. Т.3. №2. – С. 39-55. https://doi.org/10.52301/2957-5567-2024-3-2-39-55

6. Қасымова Б. Сложные глаголы в современном казахском языке. Автореф. дис.... канд. филол. наук. – АлмаАта, Казахский педагогический университет имени Абая, 1992. – 22 с.

7. Қасымова Б. Қазіргі қазақ тіліндегі күрделі етістіктер. – Алматы, 1996. – 110 б.

8. Кононов А.Н. Грамматика современного литературного узбекского языка. – Москва – Ленинград: Изд-во АН СССР, 1960. – 446 с.

9. Маманов Ы. Қазақ тіл білімінің мәселелері / Құраст.: А. Анес. – Алматы: Баспасы «Абзал-Ай», 2014. – 488 б.

10. Оралбаева Н.О. Аналитические формы глаголы в современном казахском языке. – Дис... докт. филол.наук. – Алма-Ата, 1971. – 405 с.

11. Оралбаева Н.О. Қазақ тіліндегі етістіктің категориялары. – Алма-Ата, 1980. – 60 б.

12. Скородумова П.Ю. Серийные конструкции в иврите. – Дис. канд. филол. наук. – Москва: МГУ им. М. В. Ломоносова, 2010.

13. Темиргазина З.К., Андрющенко О.К., Амангелді А. Глаголы с семантикой ремесленных действий в словаре Махмуда ал-Кашгари как отражение хозяйственной и социальной жизни древних тюрков. Turkic Studies Journal. – 2024. Т. 6. № 4. – С. 150–167. http://doi.org/10.32523/2664-5157-2024-4-150-167

14. Теньер Л. Основы структурного синтаксиса. / Пер. с франц. Вступ. ст. и общ. ред. В. Г. Гака. – Москва: Прогресс, 1988. – 656 с.

15. Харисов А. Категория глагольного вида в башкирском языке. – Уфа: Башгосиздат, 1944. – 92 с.

16. Шлуинский А. К типологии морфосинтаксических техник «соединений событий воедино». Вестник МГГУ им. М.А. Шолохова. Серия Филологические науки. – 2014. №4. – С. 86–109.

17. Ысқақов А. Қазіргі қазақ тілі. Морфология. – Алма-Ата, 1974. – 407 б. Юлдашев А. Аналитические формы глаголов в тюркских языках. – Москва: Наука, 1965. – 275 с.

18. Aikhenvald, A. Y., Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.). Serial Verb Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

19. Balmer, W.T., Grant, F.C.F. A grammar of the Fante-Akan language. London: Atlantis Press, 1929.

20. Bozsahin, C. Serialization and the verb in Turkish coordinate reduction. Dilbilim Aras¸tırmaları [Journal of Linguistic Research]. 2011. 22(1). Р. 51-67.

21. Bridges, M. Auxiliary Verbs in Uyghur. Master's Thesis, University of Kansas, Lawrence, 2008. Comrie, B. Language universals and linguistic typology: syntax and morphology. Oxford: Blackwell, 1981. 252 р.

22. Csató, É.Á., Johanson, L. On the Grammaticalization of Two Types of ki in Turkic. Türkiyat Mecmuası, 31, Özel Sayı.(2021). Р. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.994834

23. Early, R. Nuclear Layer Serialization in Lewo. Oceanic Linguistics, 32/1. 1993. P. 65–93.

24. Ekundayo, S. A., Akinnaso, F. N. Yoruba serial verb string commutability constraints. Lingua, 60. 1983. P. 115–133.

25. Erdal, M.A Grammar of Old Turkic. Boston: Brill, 2004. 588 p.

26. Essilfie, T. Causation and the role of serialisation in Fante. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 1984. 27. P. 52–63.

27. Foley, W.A., Olson, M. Clausehood and verb serialization. In: Nichols, J. (ed.), Grammar inside and outside the clause. P. 17-60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.

28. Forson, B. On the morphology of Akan serial constructions. In: Hutchison, J. P., Manfredi, V. (eds.). Current approaches to African linguistics, 7. 1990. P. 63–66. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110884906.

29. George, I. Grammar of Kwa-type Verb Serialization. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles. 1975.

30. Givón, T. Serial verbs and syntactic change: Niger-Congo. In: Word order and word order change. Austin. 1975. P. 47–112.

31. Givón, T. Serial verbs and the mental reality of ‘event’: grammatical vs. cognitive packaging. In: Traugott, E. C., Heine, B. (eds.). Approaches to grammaticalization 1. Amsterdam. 1991. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.06giv

32. Hai, Tran Trong. Verb concatenation in Vietnamese. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 2. 1975. P. 243–272.

33. Haspelmath, M., Ekkehard, K. (eds). Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective: structure and meaning of adverbial verb forms – adverbial participles, gerunds. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1995. 565 p.

34. Hoeksema, J. Complex Predicates and Liberation in Dutch and English. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14(6). 1991. P. 661–710.

35. Lu, J. H.-T. The verb-verb construction with a directional complement in Mandarin. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 1973. 1(2). P. 239–255.

36. Sebba, M. The syntax of serial verbs: an investigation into serialisation in Sranan and other languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1987. 233 р.

37. Stewart, J.M. Some restrictions on objects in Twi. Journal of African Languages, 2. 1963. P. 145-149.

38. Weiss, D. Verb serialization in northeast Europe: The case of Russian and its Finno-Ugric neighbours. In: Wiemer, B., Wälchli, B., Hansen, B. (eds.) Grammatical Replication and Borrowability in Language Contact. P. 611-646. Berlin, 2012. Westermann, D. Grammatik der Ewe-Sprache. [Grammar of the Ewe language]. P. 94-101. Berlin: Reimer, 1907 (in German)

39. Ying, Fan. Serial verb constructions in Mandarin Chinese and Jinjiang Southern Mina. PhD dissertation. The University of Manchester, 2016.