Preview

Tiltanym

Advanced search

LINGUOSYNERGY OF KAZAKH AND TURKISH PAREMIA

https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2024-4-25-39

Abstract

The article is dedicated to exploring the characteristic features of the Kazakh and Turkish paremiological funds. The aim of this research is to identify the synergistic connections between Kazakh and Turkish proverbs and sayings, as well as their common and distinctive features. Scientific-theoretical research methods were utilized to achieve the research goal. An analysis was conducted within the framework of 340 paremic units in Kazakh and 309 in Turkish languages. As a result of this study, the author concluded that Kazakh and Turkish proverbs exhibit a certain complex of similarities and differences in cognitive, ethnolinguistic, pragmatic, and synergistic aspects. Synergistic connections of paremia were analyzed, considered as separate logical units, linguistic phenomena, forms of artistic perception of the surrounding world, highlighting their special role in contemporary Eastern culture. It is important to study paremia as separate linguistic units reflecting the mentality of the nation, its worldview, and attitude towards the surrounding world. The call of each generation to revive the national, traditional, cultural, and everyday ethnic relations of their ancestors justifies the relevance of the proposed topic. The study of the Kazakh-Turkish paremiological fund in the aspect of linguo-synergetics, analysis of the common and specific features of proverbs related to the Kipchak and Oghuz groups, as well as the statistical-semantic analysis of lexemes of the Kazakh-Turkish paremiological fund demonstrate the originality and novelty of the research.

About the Author

B. Dinayeva
Astana IT University
Kazakhstan

Bekzat Dinayeva, Candidate of Philological Sciences

Astana



References

1. Adambaev, B. (1974) Maqal-mateldіng ultaralyq sipaty. Qazaq SSR GA Habarlary, Tіl-adebiet serijasy, №1. [Adambayev, B. (1974)International nature of proverbs. News of the Academy of Kazakh USR, language and literature series, №1] (in Kazakh)

2. Aksoy, O. (2007) Atasözleri ve Deyimler Sözlüğü. Istanbul, 2007. 219 s. [Aksoy, O. (2007) Dictionary of Proverbs and Idioms. Istanbul, 2007. 219 p.] (in Turkish)

3. Antonova, E.N. (2020) Paremiologija bez granic: monografiуa. Moskva: RUDN, 244 s. [Antonova, E. (2020) Paremiology without borders: monograph. Moscow: RUDN, 244 p.] (in Russian)

4. Bashgoz, I. (1994) The Horse does the Work, the Hero Boasts: the Seven-Century Life of a Turkish Proverb. Proverbium, Vol. 11, P. 47-57.

5. Beğenmez, M. (2013) Atasözlerіnde Günlük Hayat. Yayımlanmamış Yuksek Lіsans Tezі, Afyon Kosatere Unіversіtesі Sosyal Bіlіmler Enstіtüsü, Afyon Karahіsar. [Bеğеnmez, M. (2013) Daily Life in Proverbs. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Afyon University, Institute of Social Sciences. Afyon Karahisar.] (in Turkish)

6. Çobanoğlu, O. (2004) Türk Dünyası Ortak Atasözleri Sözlüğü. Ankara: Atatürk Kültür Merkezi Başkanlığı, 558 s. [Çobanoglu, O. (2004) Turkish World Common Proverbs Dictionary. Ankara: Ataturk Cultural Center Presidency, 558 p.] (in Turkish)

7. Dandis, A. (1978) O strukture poslovic. Paremiologicheskij sbornik. Moskva: Nauka, 320 s. [Dandis, A. (1978) On the structure of proverbs. Paremiological collection. Moscow: Nauka, 320 p.] (in Russian)

8. Dilek, I. (1996) Altay Türklerinin Atasözleri. Türk Dünyası Dil ve Edebiyat Dergisi. Ankara, 450 s. [Dilek, I. (1996) Proverbs of the Altay Turks. Turkish Worldasi Journal of Language and Literature, Ankara, 450 p.] (in Turkish)

9. Dinaeva, B.B. (2013) Qazaq maqal-mаtelderining pragma-kognitivtik aspektisi. Astana, 160 b. [Dinayeva, B. (2013) Pragma-cognitive aspect of Kazakh proverbs: monograph. Astana, 160 p.] (in Kazakh)

10. Elubai, A. (2022) Konceptualdy oqytu men tarbie: qazaq zhane turik tilderindegi ajelge qatysty maqal-matelder. Qazaqstan Respublikasy Ulttyq gylym akademijasynyng Habarshysy. №6 (400), B. 45-60 [Yelubai, A. (2022) Conceptual education and training: proverbs related to women in Kazakh and Turkish languages. Herald of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan. No. 6 (400), P. 45-60] (in Kazakh)

11. Gafarova, A.S. (2017) Poslovicy VS pogovorki. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, №11(77): V. 3-h ch. Ch. 2. S. 54-57 [Gafarova, A. (2017) Proverbs VS sayings. Philological sciences. Questions of theory and practice. Tambov: Gramota, No.11(77): in 3 parts. Part 2. P. 54-57] (in Russian)

12. Gvozdev, V.V. (1979) O strukturno-semanticheskih osobennostjah teksta poslovic (na materiale francuzskogo jazyka). Sbornik nauchnyh trudov. MGPIIYA im. M.Toreza. Moskva, S. 186-197. [Gvozdev, V. (1979) On the structural and semantic features of the text of proverbs (based on the material of the French language). Collection of scientific papers. Moscow State Pedagogical Institute named after. M. Thorez. Moscow, P. 186-197] (in Russian)

13. Gönen, S. (2006) Türklerіn manzum atasözlerі üzerіne bіr araştırma [Gоnen, S. (2006) А study оn рrоvеrbs іn vеrsе fоrm іn wеstеrn Turks. Konya, 729 p.] (in Turkish)

14. Gönen, O. (2022) Türk atasözlerіnde sözlü іletіşіm unsurlarının sunumu. Izmіr, 2022. 339 s. Rresentatіon of verbal sommunіsatіon somronents іn turkіsh rroverbs. [Gonen, O. (2022) Presentation of verbal communication elements in Turkish proverbs. İzmir, 339 p.] (in Turkish)

15. Gürsu, U. (2009) Kazak Türkçesі ve Türkіye Türkçesіndekі atasözlerіnіn karşılaştırmalı olarak іncelenmesі. Istanbul, 1608 s. [Gursu, U. (2009) А Соmраrаtіvе Study оf Kаzаkh аnd Turkіsh рrоvеrbs. Istanbul, 1608 p.] (in Turkish)

16. Hasan, H. (1997) Makedonya ve Kosova Türklerinde Kullanılan Atasözleri ve Deyimler. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu, 120 s. [Hasan, H. (1997) Proverbs and Idioms Used by Turks in Macedonia and Kosovo. Ankara: Turkish Language Association, 120 p.] (in Turkish)

17. Kambarova, M.A. (2023) Semanticheskie harakteristiki poslovic kazahskogo jazyka s bazovoj leksemoj «chelovek». Tiltanym. №4(92). Almaty, S. 45-55 [Kambarova, M. (2023) Semantic characteristics of proverbs of the Kazakh language with the basic lexeme «man». Tiltanym. № 4(92). Almaty, S. 45-55] (in Russian)

18. Kornilov, O.A. (2011) Jazykovye kartiny mira kak proizvodnye nacionalnyh mentalitetov. Moskva: KDU, 350 s. [Kornilov, O. (2011) Linguistic worldviews as derivatives of national mentalities. Moscow: KDU, 350 p.] (in Russian)

19. Mankeеva, Zh. (2008) Qazaq tіlіndegі jetnomadeni ataulardyng tanymdyq negіzderı. Almaty: Zhіbek zholy, 356 b. [Mankeуeva, Zh. (2008) Cognitive bases of ethnocultural names in the Kazakh language. Almaty: Zhibek zholy, 356 p.] (in Kazakh)

20. Mankeeva, Zh. (2021) Qazaq sozining sinergijasy. Almaty: Qazaq universitetі, 272 s. [Mankeyeva, Zh. (2021) Synergy of the Kazakh word. Almaty, 272 p.] (in Kazakh)

21. Muallimoglu, N. (1990) Turkish Delights A Treasury of Proverbs and Folk Saying. Istanbul. (in English)

22. Pihtovnikova, L.S. (2010) Pragmalingvistika i lingvopoetika malyh form i sinergetika diskursa (odno iz napravlenij Hakovskoj lingvisticheskoj shkoly, germanskie jazyki). Aktualnye problemy filologii: jazykoznanie, perevodovedenie, metodika prepodavanija filologicheskih mezhvuzov. nauch. konf., 28-29 maja 2010: tezisy dop. Mariupol: PGTU, S. 14-18 [Pikhtovnikova, L. (2010) Pragmalinguistics and linguopoetics of small forms and synergetics of discourse (one of the directions of the Hakovian linguistic school, Germanic languages). Current problems of philology: linguistics, translation studies, methods of teaching philology at interuniversities. scientific Conf., May 28-29, 2010: additional abstracts. Mariupol: PSTU, P. 14-18] (in Russian)

23. Pihtovnikova, L.S. (2005) Stilistika i sinergetika diskursa. Harkov: Konstanta, S. 29-35. [Pikhtovnikova, L. (2005) Stylistics and synergetics of discourse. Kharkov: Constanta, P. 29-35] (in Russian)

24. Qaidar, A. (1998) Qazaq jetnolingvistikasy. Qazaq tіlіnіng ozektі maselelerі. Almaty, 304 b. [Kaidar, A. (1998) Kazakh ethnolinguistics. Actual problems of the Kazakh language. Almaty, 304 p.] (in Kazakh)

25. Salimova, L.M. (2012) Teorija jazykovoj lichnosti: sovremennoe sostojanie i perspektivy issledovanija. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta. Serija Filologija i iskusstvovedenie. №3. S. 1514-1517. [Salimova, L. (2012) The theory of linguistic personality: current state and prospects for research. Bulletin of the Bashkir University. Series Philology and art history. No.3. P. 1514-1517.] (in Russian)

26. Tash, H. (1995) Erzurumda kullanılan atasözleri ve deyimler. Türk Dil Kurumu. Ankara, №525. S. 1025-1032 [Tash, H. (1995) Proverbs and idioms used in Erzurum. Turkish Language Society. Ankara, №525. P. 1025-1032] (in Turkish)

27. Torun, Y. (2002) Dokuztekne Köyünden Derlenen Atasözleri ve Deyimler Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. Adana, S. 185-192 [Torun, Y. (2002) A Study on Proverbs and Idioms Compiled from Dokuztekne Village. Çukurova University Social Sciences Institute Journal. Adana, P. 185-192] (in Turkish)

28. Yanar, A. (2023) Hayvan Motifli Atasözleri ve Deyimlerimiz. Ankara: Parana Yayınları, 389 s. [Yanar, A. (2023) Proverbs and Idioms with Animal Motifs. Ankara: Parana Publications, 389 p.] (in Turkish).


Review

For citations:


Dinayeva B. LINGUOSYNERGY OF KAZAKH AND TURKISH PAREMIA. Tiltanym. 2024;96(4):25-39. (In Kazakh) https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2024-4-25-39

Views: 326


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2411-6076 (Print)
ISSN 2709-135X (Online)