МЕТОДЫ ПОНИМАНИЯ ИДИОМ, ИСПОЛЬЗУЕМЫЕ ИЗУЧАЮЩИМИ КАЗАХСКИЙ И РУССКИЙ ЯЗЫКИ

В этой статье автор продемонстрировал, как изучающие казахский язык (KLL) и изучающие русский язык (RLL) в Казахстане понимают идиомы в шутках. В исследовании приняли участие 25 участников (20 KLL и 5 RLL), которым было предложено прочитать 10 английских и 10 русских анекдотов, некоторые из которых содержали идиомы. Исследователь проанализировала Think-Aloud протоколы участников, выявив 20 стратегий понимания идиом, которые можно разделить на три категории: когнитивные, метакогнитивные и социально-аффективные. Автор также обнаружила пять основных трудностей, с которыми участники столкнулись во время задания на понимание идиом, таких как незнакомые идиомы и культурные различия.  

Выводы исследования предполагают, что в обучение иностранному языку следует включить подробное обучение стратегиям понимания, включая идиомы и шутки. Кроме того, исследование подчеркивает важность стратегий понимания идиом для изучающих ИЯ при расшифровке значения неизвестных идиом, встречающихся при чтении текстов на ИЯ.

1. Bannert, M., & Mengelkamp, Ch. (2008). Assessment of metacognitive skills by means of instruction to think aloud and reflect when prompted. Does the verbalization method affect learning? Metacognition Learning, 3, 39–58. doi 10.1007/s11409-007-9009-6

2. Berkowitz, E., & Cicchelli, T. (2004). Metacognitive strategy use in the reading of gifted high achieving and gifted underachieving middle school students in New York City. Education and Urban Society, 37, 37-57. doi: 10.1177/0013124504268072

3. Brown, R, Pressley, M, Van Meter, P, & Schuder, T. (2004). A quasi-experimental validation of transactional strategies instruction with low-achieving second-grade readers. In R.B. Ruddell, & N.J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading. (5th ed.). (pp. 998–1040). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

4. Cieślicka, A. (2006). Literal salience in on-line processing of idiomatic expressions by second language learners, Second Language Research, 22, 115–144.

5. Cote, N., & Goldman, S. (2004). Building representation of informational text: Evidence from children’s think-aloud protocols. In R.B. Ruddell, & N.J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 660–683). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

6. Dewey, D.P. (2004). A Comparison of reading development by learners of Japanese in intensive domestic immersion and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 303-327. doi: 10.1017/0S0272263104062072

7. Gascoigne, C. (2002). Documenting the initial second language reading experience: The readers speak. Foreign Language Annals, 35, 554–560.

8. Grant, L.E. (2007). In a manner of speaking: Assessing frequent spoken figurative idioms to assist ESl/EFL teachers. System, 35, 169–181.

9. Hempelmann, Ch. F. (2008). Computational humor: Beyond the pun?‖ In V. Raskin, (Ed.), The primer of humor research. (pp. 333–360). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

10. Janssen, T., Braaksma, M., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2006). Literary reading activities of good and weak students: A think aloud study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21, 35–52.

11. Kaakinen, J.K. & Hyönä, J. (2005). Perspective effects on expository text comprehension: Evidence from think-aloud protocols, eye-tracking, and recall. Discourse Processes, 40, 239–257.

12. Laing, S.P., & Kamhi, A.G. (2002). The use of Think-Aloud protocols to compare inferencing abilities in average and below-average readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 436-447.

13. Lau, K-L. (2006). Reading strategy use between Chinese good and poor readers: A think-aloud study. Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 383–399. doi: 10.1111/j.1467–9817.2006.0302.x

14. Leow, R.P. (2001), Attention, awareness, and foreign language behavior. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Formfocused instruction and second language learning: Language learning monograph, Volume 4 (pp. 113-155). Wiley-Blackwell.

15. Leow, R.P., & Morgan-Short, K. (2004). To think aloud or not to think aloud. The issue of reactivity in SLA research methodology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 35–57. doi: 10.1017/S0272263104261022

16. Li, D. (2004). Trustworthiness of think-aloud protocols in the study of translation processes. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 301–313.

17. Malt, B.C., & Eiter, B. (2004). Even with a green card, you can be put out to pasture and still have to work: Non-native intuitions of the transparency of common English idioms. Memory and Cognition, 32, 896-904.

18. McKeown, R.G. & Gentilucci, J.L. (2007). Think-Aloud Strategy: Metacognitive development and monitoring comprehension in the middle school second-language classroom. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 51, 136–147. doi:10.1598/JAAL.51.2.5

19. Schmitz, J.R. (2002). Humor as a pedagogical tool in foreign language and translation courses. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 15, 89–113.

20. Schuller, J.M. (2009). Gender and foreign language reading comprehension. In C.Brantmeier (Ed.) Crossing languages and research methods: Analyses of adult foreign language reading. (pp.147–167). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

21. Simmons, B., Lanuza, D., Fonteyn, M., Hicks, F., & Holm, K. (2003). Clinical reasoning in experienced nurses. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25, 701–719. doi: 10.1177/0193945903253092