tilTiltanymTiltanym2411-60762709-135XИнститут языкознания имени А.Байтурсынулы КН МОН РК10.55491/2411-6076-2023-1-90-108til-690Research ArticleСтатьиКОММУНИКАТИВНЫЕ СТРАТЕГИИ, ВЫРАЖАЕМЫЕ ВОПРОСТИТЕЛЬНЫМИ РЕЧЕВЫМИ АКТАМИ НА КАЗАХСКОМ ЯЗЫКЕCOMMUNICATION STRATEGIES EXPRESSED BY INTERROGATIVE SPEECH ACTS IN THE KAZAKH LANGUAGEЕликбаевБ. К.YelikbayevB. K.

Шымкент

Shymken

75koshikbaeva75@mail.ruКошикбаеваГ. Д.KoshikbayevaG. D.

Shymken

75koshikbaeva75@mail.ruЫбырайымА. О.YbyrayimA. O.

Шымкент

Shymken

75koshikbaeva75@mail.ruЮжно-Казахстанский университет имени М. АуэзоваM. Auezov South Kazakhstan University20233103202389190108Copyright © Еликбаев Б.К., Кошикбаева Г.Д., Ыбырайым А.О., 20232023Еликбаев Б.К., Кошикбаева Г.Д., Ыбырайым А.О.Yelikbayev B.K., Koshikbayeva G.D., Ybyrayim A.O.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.tiltanym.kz/jour/article/view/690

Любой речевой акт основывается на коммуникативной цели говорящего и направлен на выражение коммуникативной стратегии и тактики, прагматики, эмоционально-экспрессивной точки зрения адресата. При этом в статье поставлена цель определить прагматику вопросительного речевого акта и коммуникативные стратегии, передаваемые вопросительными предложениями.

В ходе исследования были выявлены следующие коммуникативные стратегии вопросительного речевого акта на казахском языке: запрос (обмен) информации, уточнение информации, приветствие, поиск, знание мнения другого человека, знание чужого намерения одобрения/неодобрения, демонстрация своих многочисленных знаний, стремление к пониманию, привлечение внимания (интереса), определение победителя, просьба, консультация (совет), предложение, запрос разрешения, проверка, расследование, контратака,  оправдываться, предупреждение, отказ, обвинение (укор), приказывание, запрещать, запугивание и смешанная стратегия.   

Коммуникативные стратегии, используемые в вопросительном речевом акте на казахском языке, не ограничиваются перечисленными выше. Поскольку вся человеческая языковая коммуникация состоит из информативных, вопросительных, повелительных предложений, вопросительные предложения составляют четверть этих речевых актов. Конечно, информативные предложения имеют большой вес. Тем не менее, вопросительные предложения также имеют большую функцию установления общечеловеческого языкового общения.

Результаты исследования имеют большое научно-практическое значение в области прагматики, теории речевого акта и др., которые являются новыми областями в казахском языкознании.

Any speech act is based on the communicative purpose of the speaker and is aimed at expressing the communicative strategy and tactics, pragmatics, and emotional and expressive point of view of the addressee. At the same time, the paper aims to determine the pragmatics of the interrogative speech act and the communicative strategies conveyed by interrogative sentences.

In the course of the study, the following communicative strategies of the interrogative speech act in the Kazakh language were identified: request (exchange) of information, clarification of information, greeting, search, knowledge of another person's opinion, knowledge of someone else's intention of approval/disapproval, demonstration of one's numerous knowledge, striving for understanding, attracting attention (interest), determining the winner, request, consultation (advice), proposal, request for permission, verification, investigation, counterattack, justify, warning, refusal, accusation (reproach), ordering, forbidding, intimidation and mixed strategy. 

The communicative strategies used in the interrogative speech act in the Kazakh language are not limited to those listed above. Since all human language communication consists of informative, interrogative, and imperative sentences, interrogative sentences make up a quarter of these speech acts. Of course, informative offers carry a lot of weight. Nevertheless, interrogative sentences also have the great function of establishing universal language communication.

The results of the study are of great scientific and practical importance in the field of pragmatics, theory of speech act, etc., which are new areas in Kazakh linguistics.

прагматикакоммуникативная стратегиякоммуникативная тактикаречевой актвопросительное предложениеpragmaticscommunicative strategycommunicative tacticsspeech actquestion sentenceReferencesAustin J.L. How to do things with words. The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. – Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962. – 166 p.Austin J.L. How to do things with words. The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. – Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962. – 166 p. (in English)Богданов В.В. Классификация речевых актов // Личностные аспекты языкового общения: Межвуз. сб. научн. трудов. – Калинин: Изд-во Калинин. ун-та, 1989. – С.25-37.Akkuzova A.A. Antropoozektik paradigma: korkem matinnin kommunikativtik-pragmatikalyq aleueti (D.Isabekova shygarmalarynyn negizinde). 6D021300 – Lingvistika. Filosofia doktory (PhD) darezhesin alu ushin daiyndalgan dissertasia. – Almaty, 2020. – 168 b. [Akkuzova A.A. The anthropo-linguistic paradigm: the communicative and pragmatic potential of a literary text (based on the works of D. Isabekov). 6D021300 – Linguistics. Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD). – Almaty, 2020. – 168 p.] (in Kazakh)Британ И.Б. Вопросительные предложения в авторской речи художественного текста: На материале произведений немецких авторов и их переводов: Дисс. ... канд. филол. наук. – Краснодар, 2005. – 183 с.Alkebaeva D.A., Ahmetkalieva L.Zh. Pragmatika negizderi: oilau men soikeu // Al-Farabi atyndagy Qazaq ulttyh universitetinin Habarshysy. Filologia seriasy. 2018. – №2 (170). – 74-81 bb. [Alkebaeva D.A., Ahmetkalieva L.Zh. Fundamentals of Pragmatics: Thinking and Speech // Bulletin of Al-Farabi Kazakh National University. Philology series. 2018. – №2 (170). – P.74-81.Ван Дейк Т.А. Язык. Познание. Коммуникация. – М.:, Прогресс, 1989. – 245 с.Bogdanov V.V. (1989) Klassifikasia reshebyh aktov // Lichnostnye aspekty iazykovogo obshenia: Mezhvuz. sb. nauchn. trudov. – Kalinin: Izd-vo Kalinin. un-ta, 1989. – S.25-37. [Bogdanov V.V. (1989) Classification of speech acts // Personal aspects of language communication: Inter-university collection of scientific works. – Kalinin: Kalinin Publishing House. un-ta, 1989. – P.25-37] (in Russian)Гийом Г. Принципы теоретической лингвистики. – М.: Прогресс, 1992. – 224 с.Borisova I.N. Kategoria tseli I aspecty textovogo analyza // Zhanry rechi: Sbornik nauchnyh statei. – Saratov: Izd-bo Gos. Unb. «Colledzh», 1999. Byp.2. – S. 81-96 [Borisova I.N. Category goals and aspects of text analysis // Genres of speech: Collection of scientific articles. – Saratov: Publishing house of Gos. Unts «College», 1999. Issue.2. – pp. 81-96] (in Russian)Grice H.P. Utterer’s meaning, sentence-meaning, and word-meaning // Foundation of Language. – 1968. – Vol. 4. – No 3. – P. 225-242.Britan I.B. Voprositelnye predlozhenia v avtorskoi rechi hudozhestvennogo teksta: Na materiale proizvedenii nemetskih avtorov i ih perevodov: Diss. … kand. filol. nauk. – Krasnodar, 2005. – 183 s. [Britan I.B. Interrogative sentences in the author's speech of a literary text: Based on the works of German authors and their translations: Dissertation ... Candidate of Philology: 02.10.20. – Krasnodar, 2005. – 183 p.] (in Russian)Grice P. Logic and conversation // Syntax and semantics. – N.Y.: Academic Press, 1975. – p.41-58; Fodor J. The Modularity of Mind. – Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1983. – 217 p.Van Deik T.A. Iazyk. Poznanie. Kommunikatsia. – M.:, Progress, 1989. – 245 s. [Van Dyke T.A. Language. Cognition. Communication. – M.:, Progress, 1989. – 245 p.] (in Russian)Jack C. Richards // Communicative Language Teaching Today. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo Cambridge University Press. 2006.Vikulova L.G. Mediinoe communicativnoe prostranstvo: nauchno-populiaryi zhurnal predmetnoi sfery «pyteshestvie» // Vestnik Uyzhno-Uralskogo dosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2018. Т.15. – № 1. – S. 43-49. [Vikulova L.G. Media communicative space: popular scientific journal of the subject area «journey» // Bulletin of the South Ural State University. – 2018. Vol.15. – No. 1. – P. 43-49.] (in Russian)https://www.professorjackrichards.com/wp-content/uploads/Richards-Communicative-Language.pdfGiiom G. Prinsipy teoreticheskoi lingvistiki. – M.: Progress, 1992. – 224 s. [Guillaume G. Principles of theoretical linguistics. – M.: Progress, 1992. – 224 p.] (in Russian)Жәкішев Е.Ғ. «Криминалистік тактика» // «Жеті жарғы». – Алматы, 1997. – 46 б.Goikhman O.Ia., Nadeina T.M. Rechevaia communicatsia. – M.: INFRA-M, 2001. – 272 s. [Goikhman O.Ya., Nadeina T.M. Speech communication. – M.: INFRA-M, 2001. – 272 p.] (in Russian)Колшанский Г.В. Прагматика языка. – М.: Изд-во МГПИИЯ им. М.Тореза, 1980. – 176 с.Essenova H.O. Qazirgi qazaq media-matinnin pragmatikasy (qazaq baspasoz materialdary negizinde). 10.02.02 – qazaq tiki. Filologia gyl. doktory … diss. avtoreferaty. – Almaty, 2007. – 49 bet. [Essenova H.O. Pragmatics of modern Kazakh media text (based on materials of the Kazakh press). 10.02.02 – Kazakh language. Philological science. doctor дис diss. abstract. – Алматы, 2007. – 49 p.] (in Kazakh)Кубрякова Е.С. Номинативный аспект речевой деятельности. – М.: Наука, 1986. – 158 с.Grice H.P. Utterer’s meaning, sentence-meaning, and word-meaning // Foundation of Language. – 1968. – Vol. 4. – No 3. – P. 225-242. (in English)Куркимбаева А.М. Туристік блогинг: коммуникативтік стратегиялар мен тактикалар (ағылшын және қазақ тілі материалдары негізінде): Филол. ғыл. канд. ... дисс. – Алматы, 2021. – 214 б.Grice P. Logic and conversation // Syntax and semantics. – N.Y.: Academic Press, 1975. – P.41-58.Минкин Л.М. Новая теория прагматики и некоторые идеи современной лингвистики // Вісник Харків. ун-ту.– № 390 – 1997. – С.101-104.Faerch C., Kasper G. Strategies in Interlanguage Communication. London: Longman, 1983. – 253 p.Moeschler J., Reboul A. Dictionnaire encyclopdique de pragmatique. – Paris: Seuil, 1994. – 975 p.Fodor J. The Modularity of Mind. – Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1983. – 217 p. (in English)Morris Ch. Foundations of the Theory of Signs. – Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1938. – 59 p.Jack C. Richards // Communicative Language Teaching Today. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo Cambridge University Press. 2006.Почепцов Г.Г. Прагматический аспект изучения предложения // Иностр. яз. в школе. – 1975. – № 6. – С.15-25.https://www.professorjackrichards.com/wp-content/uploads/Richards-Communicative-Language.pdf (in English)Searle J.R. Speech Acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. – Cambridge: CUP, 1969. – 203 p.Zaurbekova L.Zh. Korkem matindegi tildin funksionaldy pragmatikalyq aspektileri. 6D020500 – Filologia. Filosofia doktory (PhD) … diss. – Almaty, 2022. – 139 b. [Zaurbekova L.Zh. Functional pragmatic aspects of language in a literary text. 6D020500 – Philology. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) diss. – Almaty, 2022. – 139 p.] (in Kazakh)Соссюр Фердинанд де. Курс общей лингвистики / Пер. с французского А. М. Сухотина, под редакцией и с примечаниями Р. И. Шор. – М.: Едиториал УРСС, 2004. – 256 с.Issers O.S. Communicativnyie strategii i tactici russkoi rechi. Izd. 5-е. – М.: Izdatelstvo LKI, 2008. – 288 s. [Issers O.S. Communicative strategies and tactics of Russian speech. – Ed. 5-e. – M.: LKI Publishing House, 2008. – 288 p.] (in Russian)Sperber D., Wilssn D. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. – Oxford: OUP, 1986. – 208 p.Zhakishev E.G. «Kriminalistik taktika» // «Zhetl zargy». – Almaty, 1997. – 46 b. [Dzhakishev E.G. «Criminalistic tactics» // «Seven decrees». – Almaty, 1997. – 46 p.] (in Kazakh)Сусов И.П. Семантика и прагматика предложения. – Калинин: Изд-во Калинин. ун-та, 1980. – 51 с.Klyuev E.V. Reshevaia kommunikasia: Ucheb.posobie dlia un-tov i in-tov. – M: RIPOL Classic, 2002. – 316 s. [Klyuev E.V. Speech communication: Textbook for univ and in-tov. – M: RIPOL Classic, 2002. – 316 p.] (in Russian)Van Dijk T.A. Studies in the pragmatics of discourse. – The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, 1982. – 331 p.Kolshanskii G.V. Pragmatika iazyka. – M.: Izd-vo MGPIIIA im. M.Toreza, 1980. – 176 s. [Kolshansky G.V. Pragmatics of language. – M.: Publishing House of the Moscow State Pedagogical Institute named after M.Torez, 1980. – 176 p.] (in Russian)Шевченко И.С. Историческая динамика прагматики предложения: английское вопросительное предложение 16-20 вв.: Монография. – Харьков: Константа, 1998. – 168 с.Kurkembaieva A.M. Turistik bloging: kommunikativtik strategialar men taktikalar (agylshyn zhane qazaq tili materialdary negizinde): Diss. … kand. filol. nauk. – Almaty, 2021. – 214 b. [Kurkembayeva A.M. Travel blogging: communicative strategies and tactics (based on materials of English and Kazakh languages)] (in Kazakh)Якобсон Р.О. Избранные работы. – М.: Прогресс, 1985. – 460 с.Matveeva G.G., Samarskaia L.N. Dva napravlenia v sovromennoi pragmalingvistike // Vestnik Sankt-Peterbyrgskogo universiteta. – 2009. – №1(2). – S. 50-56 [Matveeva G.G., Samarskaya L.N. Two directions in modern pragmalinguistics // Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. -2009. – №1(2). – P. 50-56] (in Russian)Minkin L.M. Novaia theoria pragmatiki i nekotorye ideii sovremennoi lingvistiki // Віsnik Harkiv. un-tu.– № 390 – 1997. – S.101-104. [Minkin L.M. A new theory of pragmatics and some ideas of modern linguistics // Visnik Harkiv. un-tu.– No. 390 – 1997. – P.101-104] (in Russian)Minkin L.M. Novaia theoria pragmatiki i nekotorye ideii sovremennoi lingvistiki // Віsnik Harkiv. un-tu.– № 390 – 1997. – S.101-104. [Minkin L.M. A new theory of pragmatics and some ideas of modern linguistics // Visnik Harkiv. un-tu.– No. 390 – 1997. – P.101-104] (in Russian)Moeschler J., Reboul A. Dictionnaire encyclopdique de pragmatique. – Paris: Seuil, 1994. – 975 p. (in English)Moeschler J., Reboul A. Dictionnaire encyclopdique de pragmatique. – Paris: Seuil, 1994. – 975 p. (in English)Morris Ch. Foundations of the Theory of Signs. – Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1938. – 59 p. (in English)Morris Ch. Foundations of the Theory of Signs. – Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1938. – 59 p. (in English)Pospelova Yu.Yu. Pedagogicheskii diskurs I ego kharakteristiki // Vestnik KGU. – 2009. – № 1. – S. 307-310. [Pospelova Yu.Yu. Pedagogical discourse and its characteristics // Bulletin of KSU. – 2009. – No. 1. – P. 307-310] (in Russian)Pospelova Yu.Yu. Pedagogicheskii diskurs I ego kharakteristiki // Vestnik KGU. – 2009. – № 1. – S. 307-310. [Pospelova Yu.Yu. Pedagogical discourse and its characteristics // Bulletin of KSU. – 2009. – No. 1. – P. 307-310] (in Russian)Pocheptsov G.G. Pragmatisheskii aspect izuchenia predlozhenia // Inostr. iaz. v shkole. – 1975. – № 6. – S.15-25. [Pocheptsov G.G. The pragmatic aspect of the study of the proposal // Foreign language at school. - 1975. – No. 6. – P.15-25.] (in Russian)Pocheptsov G.G. Pragmatisheskii aspect izuchenia predlozhenia // Inostr. iaz. v shkole. – 1975. – № 6. – S.15-25. [Pocheptsov G.G. The pragmatic aspect of the study of the proposal // Foreign language at school. - 1975. – No. 6. – P.15-25.] (in Russian)Searle J.R. Speech Acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. – Cambridge: CUP, 1969. – 203 p. (in English)Searle J.R. Speech Acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. – Cambridge: CUP, 1969. – 203 p. (in English)Salakhova A.G. Diskurs: funktsionalno-pragmaticheskii i funktsionalnyi aspehty: kollektiv. monofr. / otv. red. E.N. Aznachaeva. – Cheliabinsk: Cheliab. gos. un-t, 2008. – S. 149-182. [Salakhova A.G. Discourse: functional-pragmatic and functional aspects: collective. monogr. / ed. by E.N. Aznacheev. – Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinsk State University, 2008. – S. 149-182.] (in Russian)Salakhova A.G. Diskurs: funktsionalno-pragmaticheskii i funktsionalnyi aspehty: kollektiv. monofr. / otv. red. E.N. Aznachaeva. – Cheliabinsk: Cheliab. gos. un-t, 2008. – S. 149-182. [Salakhova A.G. Discourse: functional-pragmatic and functional aspects: collective. monogr. / ed. by E.N. Aznacheev. – Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinsk State University, 2008. – S. 149-182.] (in Russian)Seidalieva G.A. Merzimsi baspasozdegi stereotipterdin lingvopragmatikalyq erekshelikteri. 6D020500 – Filologia. Filosofia doktory (PhD) … diss. – Almaty, 2017. – 152 b. [Seidalieva G.A. Linguopragmatic features of stereotypes in the periodical press. 6D020500 – Philology. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) diss. – Almaty, 2017. – 152 p.] (in Kazakh)Seidalieva G.A. Merzimsi baspasozdegi stereotipterdin lingvopragmatikalyq erekshelikteri. 6D020500 – Filologia. Filosofia doktory (PhD) … diss. – Almaty, 2017. – 152 b. [Seidalieva G.A. Linguopragmatic features of stereotypes in the periodical press. 6D020500 – Philology. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) diss. – Almaty, 2017. – 152 p.] (in Kazakh)Skovorodnikov A.P. О neobhodimosti razgranichenia poniatii «ritoricheskii priem», «stylisticheskai figura», «rechevai tactika», « rechevoi zhanr» в praktike terminologicheskoi leksicograpi // Ritorika – Linguistika: sbornik ststei. – Smolensk: SGPU, 2004. – Byp 5. – S. 5-12. [Skovorodnikov A.P. On the need to differentiate the concepts of «rhetorical device», «stylistic figure», «speech tactics», «speech genre» in the practice of terminological lexicography // Rhetoric – Linguistics: collection of articles. – Smolensk: SSPU, 2004. – Issue 5. – P. 5-12.] (in Russian)Skovorodnikov A.P. О neobhodimosti razgranichenia poniatii «ritoricheskii priem», «stylisticheskai figura», «rechevai tactika», « rechevoi zhanr» в praktike terminologicheskoi leksicograpi // Ritorika – Linguistika: sbornik ststei. – Smolensk: SGPU, 2004. – Byp 5. – S. 5-12. [Skovorodnikov A.P. On the need to differentiate the concepts of «rhetorical device», «stylistic figure», «speech tactics», «speech genre» in the practice of terminological lexicography // Rhetoric – Linguistics: collection of articles. – Smolensk: SSPU, 2004. – Issue 5. – P. 5-12.] (in Russian)Sossior Ferdinand de. Kurs obshei lingvistiki / Per. S frantsuzskogo A.M. Suhotina, pod redaktsiei i s primechaniani R.I. Shor. – M.: Editorial URSS, 2004. – 256 s. [Saussure Ferdinand de. The course of general linguistics / Translated from the French by A.M. Sukhotin, edited and with notes by R. I. Shor. – M.: Editorial URSS, 2004. – 256 p.] (in Russian)Sossior Ferdinand de. Kurs obshei lingvistiki / Per. S frantsuzskogo A.M. Suhotina, pod redaktsiei i s primechaniani R.I. Shor. – M.: Editorial URSS, 2004. – 256 s. [Saussure Ferdinand de. The course of general linguistics / Translated from the French by A.M. Sukhotin, edited and with notes by R. I. Shor. – M.: Editorial URSS, 2004. – 256 p.] (in Russian)Sperber D., Wilssn D. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. – Oxford: OUP, 1986. – 208 p. (in English)Sperber D., Wilssn D. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. – Oxford: OUP, 1986. – 208 p. (in English)Susov I.P. Semantika i pragmatika predlozhenia. – Kalinin: Izd-vo Kalinin. un-ta, 1980. – 51 s. [Susov I.P. Semantics and pragmatics of the sentence. – Kalinin: Kalinin Publishing House. un-ta, 1980. – 51 s] (in Russian)Susov I.P. Semantika i pragmatika predlozhenia. – Kalinin: Izd-vo Kalinin. un-ta, 1980. – 51 s. [Susov I.P. Semantics and pragmatics of the sentence. – Kalinin: Kalinin Publishing House. un-ta, 1980. – 51 s] (in Russian)Troshina N.N. Stylististicheskie parametry textov massovoi communicatsii i realizatsii communicativnoi strategi suvekta rechevogo vozdeistvia // Rechevoe vozdeistvie v sfere massovoi communicatsii. – M.: Prosveshenie, 1990. – S. 62-68. [Troshina N.N. Stylistic parameters of mass communication texts and the implementation of the communicative strategy of the subject of speech influence // Speech influence in the sphere of mass communication. – M.: Enlightenment, 1990. – P. 62-68] (in Russian)Troshina N.N. Stylististicheskie parametry textov massovoi communicatsii i realizatsii communicativnoi strategi suvekta rechevogo vozdeistvia // Rechevoe vozdeistvie v sfere massovoi communicatsii. – M.: Prosveshenie, 1990. – S. 62-68. [Troshina N.N. Stylistic parameters of mass communication texts and the implementation of the communicative strategy of the subject of speech influence // Speech influence in the sphere of mass communication. – M.: Enlightenment, 1990. – P. 62-68] (in Russian)Trufanova I.V. Ritoricheskie figury i tipy povestvovania // Russkii iazyk: istoricheskie sudvy i sovremennost: III Mezhdunarodnyi congress issledovatelei russkogo iazyka / MGU im. L.V.Lomonosova. –M7. 2007. – 414 s. [Trufanova I.V. Rhetorical figures and types of narration // Russian Language: Historical destinies and modernity: III International Congress of Researchers of the Russian Language / Lomonosov Moscow State University. – M., 2007. – 414 p.] (in Russian)Trufanova I.V. Ritoricheskie figury i tipy povestvovania // Russkii iazyk: istoricheskie sudvy i sovremennost: III Mezhdunarodnyi congress issledovatelei russkogo iazyka / MGU im. L.V.Lomonosova. –M7. 2007. – 414 s. [Trufanova I.V. Rhetorical figures and types of narration // Russian Language: Historical destinies and modernity: III International Congress of Researchers of the Russian Language / Lomonosov Moscow State University. – M., 2007. – 414 p.] (in Russian)Chudinov A.P. Politicheskaia linguistika: uchebnoe posobie (dlia studentov vuzov). – 3-e izd. – M: Flinta: Nauka, 2008. – 254 s. [Chudinov A.P. Political Linguistics: a textbook (for university students). - 3rd ed. – Moscow: Flint: Nauka, 2008. – 254 p.] (in Russian)Chudinov A.P. Politicheskaia linguistika: uchebnoe posobie (dlia studentov vuzov). – 3-e izd. – M: Flinta: Nauka, 2008. – 254 s. [Chudinov A.P. Political Linguistics: a textbook (for university students). - 3rd ed. – Moscow: Flint: Nauka, 2008. – 254 p.] (in Russian)Shevchenko I.S. Istoricheskaiadinamika pragmatiki predlozhenia: angliiskoe voprositelnoe predlozhenie 16-20 vv.: Monograpia. – Harkov: Konstanta, 1998. – 168 s. [Shevchenko I.S. Historical dynamics of Sentence Pragmatics: English Interrogative sentence of the 16th-20th centuries: Monograph. – Kharkiv: Constant, 1998. – 168 p.] (in Russian)Shevchenko I.S. Istoricheskaiadinamika pragmatiki predlozhenia: angliiskoe voprositelnoe predlozhenie 16-20 vv.: Monograpia. – Harkov: Konstanta, 1998. – 168 s. [Shevchenko I.S. Historical dynamics of Sentence Pragmatics: English Interrogative sentence of the 16th-20th centuries: Monograph. – Kharkiv: Constant, 1998. – 168 p.] (in Russian)Yakobson P.O. Izbrannye raboty. – M.: Progress, 1985. – 460 s. [Yakobson R.O. Selected works. – M.: Progress, 1985. – 460 p.] (in Russian)Yakobson P.O. Izbrannye raboty. – M.: Progress, 1985. – 460 s. [Yakobson R.O. Selected works. – M.: Progress, 1985. – 460 p.] (in Russian)

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.