tilTiltanymTiltanym2411-60762709-135XИнститут языкознания имени А.Байтурсынулы КН МОН РКtil-459Research ArticleСтатьиЛексико-фразеологические особенности фразовых глаголов и трудности их изученияLexical-phraseological features of phrasal verbs and difficulties in their studyХусаиновК. Ш.KhusainovK. Sh.

доктор филологических наук, профессор

Алматы

Doctor of Philology, Professor

Almaty

ЖамбылкызыМ.ZhambylkyzyM.

преподаватель

кафедра дипломатического перевода

Алматы

Lecturer

Chair of Diplomatic Translation

Almaty

Институт языкознания имени А. БайтурсыноваКазахстанInstitute of Linguistics named after A. BaitursynovKazakhstanКазНУ им. Аль-ФарабиКазахстанal-Farabi Kazakh National UniversityKazakhstan20173107202204101108Copyright © Хусаинов К.Ш., Жамбылкызы М., 20222022Хусаинов К.Ш., Жамбылкызы М.Khusainov K.S., Zhambylkyzy M.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.tiltanym.kz/jour/article/view/459

   Современный английский язык имеет особенно большое количество сочетаний послелогов с глаголами. Их число неуклонно растет. Об этом свидетельствуют книги, словари, посвященные фразовым глаголам и их употреблению. Вместе с увеличением их числа растет и частота их использования. Это означает, что они выполняют желаемую функцию благодаря своей большей краткости и выразительности. Изучение фразовых глаголов - одна из самых сложных задач для человека, который хочет повысить свой уровень владения английским языком. Фразовые глаголы, которые чаще используются на разговорном уровне, уже перешли в язык средств массовой информации, бизнеса и экономики.

   Modern English language has a particularly large number of combinations of postpositions with verbs. Their number is growing steadily. This is evidenced by books, dictionaries, dedicated to phrasal verbs and their use. Along with the increasing number, the frequency of their use is also growing. This means that they perform a desired function due to their greater brevity and expressiveness. The study of phrasal verbs is one of the most difficult tasks for a person who wants to improve his or her level of the English language. Phrasal verbs that are more frequently used in conversation have already moved to the language of the media, business and economy.

фразовый глаголпредлогнаречиечастицаидиомыаналитические формысемантикасоставные глаголывспомогательный глаголphrasal verbprepositionadverbparticlesemanticsidiomsanalytical formscompound verbsauxiliary verbReferencesAnichkov I. E. (1997). Works on linguistics. Saint Petersburg: Nauka.Anichkov I. E. (1997). Works on linguistics. Saint Petersburg: Nauka.Baitursynov A. (1992). Language readings. Almaty: Аnа tili, 448 p.Baitursynov A. (1992). Language readings. Almaty: Аnа tili, 448 p.Baskakov N. A. (1963). Analytical and synthetic grammatical forms - stages of morphological word development. In: Analytical constructions in languages of various types. – Moscow - Leningrad, pp.18-19.Baskakov N. A. (1963). Analytical and synthetic grammatical forms - stages of morphological word development. In: Analytical constructions in languages of various types. – Moscow - Leningrad, pp.18-19.Black, M. (1990). Metaphor. Theory of metaphor. – Moscow, p. 153.Black, M. (1990). Metaphor. Theory of metaphor. – Moscow, p. 153.Dzhanmavov, Yu. D. (1967). Adverbial participles in the Kumyk standard language. – Moscow, p. 211.Dzhanmavov, Yu. D. (1967). Adverbial participles in the Kumyk standard language. – Moscow, p. 211.Erimbetova, A. M. (1999).From identity to the contrary: linguistic forms of expression. – Almaty, p. 8.Erimbetova, A. M. (1999).From identity to the contrary: linguistic forms of expression. – Almaty, p. 8.Ganiyev, F. A. (1963). Specific characteristic of verbs in the Tatar language. Kazan.Ganiyev, F. A. (1963). Specific characteristic of verbs in the Tatar language. Kazan.Kasymova, B. (1992). Compound verbs inthe modern Kazakh language. – Alma-Ata, 22 p.Kasymova, B. (1992). Compound verbs inthe modern Kazakh language. – Alma-Ata, 22 p.Kemelbekova, E. A. Phraseological units in English and methodsof their translationinto Russian. p. 241.Kemelbekova, E. A. Phraseological units in English and methodsof their translationinto Russian. p. 241.Kunin, A. V. (1970). English phraseology. – Moscow. p. 211.Kunin, A. V. (1970). English phraseology. – Moscow. p. 211.Malov, S. E. (1951). Monuments of the Old Turkicwriting system. – Moscow - Leningrad: Publishing house of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 447 p.Malov, S. E. (1951). Monuments of the Old Turkicwriting system. – Moscow - Leningrad: Publishing house of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 447 p.Modern Kazakh language (1952). – Moscow: Moscow State University, 519 p.Modern Kazakh language (1952). – Moscow: Moscow State University, 519 p.Ogoltsev, V. M. (1973). Fixed comparative structures in the language system. Systematicity of the Russianlanguage. –Novgorod, p. 17.Ogoltsev, V. M. (1973). Fixed comparative structures in the language system. Systematicity of the Russianlanguage. –Novgorod, p. 17.Ogoltsev, V. M. (1974). Fixed comparative structures in the system of the modern Russian language.Abstract of doctoral dissertation, p. 12.Ogoltsev, V. M. (1974). Fixed comparative structures in the system of the modern Russian language.Abstract of doctoral dissertation, p. 12.Oralbayeva, N. (1979). Verb meaning and analytical construction in themodern Kazakh language. –Almaty: Gylym, 192 p.Oralbayeva, N. (1979). Verb meaning and analytical construction in themodern Kazakh language. –Almaty: Gylym, 192 p.Povey, J. (1984). Get it right. – Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola. p. 211.Povey, J. (1984). Get it right. – Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola. p. 211.Scherbak, A. M. (1961). Grammar sketch of the language of Turkic texts of the X-XIII centuries from East Turkestan. – Moscow - Leningrad.Scherbak, A. M. (1961). Grammar sketch of the language of Turkic texts of the X-XIII centuries from East Turkestan. – Moscow - Leningrad.Sevortyan, E. V. (1965). Grammatical and semantic features of analytical constructions in distinction from collocations in Turkic languages. In: Analytical constructions in languages of various types. – Moscow - Leningrad, pp. 233-239.Sevortyan, E. V. (1965). Grammatical and semantic features of analytical constructions in distinction from collocations in Turkic languages. In: Analytical constructions in languages of various types. – Moscow - Leningrad, pp. 233-239.Smirnitsky, A. I. (1959). English morphology. Moscow. p. 54.Smirnitsky, A. I. (1959). English morphology. Moscow. p. 54.Stepanova, M.D. (1953). Morphological derivation in the modern German language. – Moscow. p.311.Stepanova, M.D. (1953). Morphological derivation in the modern German language. – Moscow. p.311.Vasilyev, A. (2005). English: rules of pronunciation and reading, grammar, conversational language. –Saint Petersburg: Znaniye. p.70.Vasilyev, A. (2005). English: rules of pronunciation and reading, grammar, conversational language. –Saint Petersburg: Znaniye. p.70.Yuldashev, A.A. (1965). Analytical verb forms in Turkic languages. –Moscow. p.21.Yuldashev, A.A. (1965). Analytical verb forms in Turkic languages. –Moscow. p.21.Zhirmunsky, V.M. (1965).On analytical constructions. In: Analytical constructions in languages of various types. –Moscow-Leningrad, p.37.Zhirmunsky, V.M. (1965).On analytical constructions. In: Analytical constructions in languages of various types. –Moscow-Leningrad, p.37.Zhubanov, K. (1966). Research on the Kazakh language. –Almaty: Gylym, 360 p.Zhubanov, K. (1966). Research on the Kazakh language. –Almaty: Gylym, 360 p.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.