tilTiltanymTiltanym2411-60762709-135XИнститут языкознания имени А.Байтурсынулы КН МОН РКtil-439Research ArticleСтатьиИНТОНАЦИОННЫЕ КОМПОНЕНТЫ КАЗАХСКОГО ЯЗЫКАINTONATION COMPONENTS OF THE KAZAKH LANGUAGEБазарбаеваЗ. М.BazarbaevaZ. M.

Доктор филологических наук, профессор 

Алматы

Doctor of Philological Sciences, professor

Almaty

Институт языкознания имени А. БайтурсынулыКазахстанInstitute of Linguistics named after A.BaitursynulyKazakhstan201527072022022936Copyright © Базарбаева З.М., 20222022Базарбаева З.М.Bazarbaeva Z.M.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.tiltanym.kz/jour/article/view/439

В статье рассматривается функция интонационных компонентов казахского языка. Определяется роль мелодики, темпа, интенсивности, тона, тонального диапазона, интервалов в речи. Описываются их акустические характеристики посредством компьютерной программы.

The article discusses the intonational components of the Kazakh language. The role of separate components such as melodics, tempo, intensity, voice-frequency range, interval has been revealed. Their acoustic characteristics by means of the computer program have been described.

мелодикатемпинтенсивностьтондиапазонинтервалmelodicstempointensityrangeintervalReferencesHart J.T. A Perceptual Study of Intonation. ambridge Academ, 2006. 102 s.Hart J.T. A Perceptual Study of Intonation. ambridge Academ, 2006. 102 s.Svetozarova N.D. Intonational System of the Russian Language. L., 1982. 112 s.Svetozarova N.D. Intonational System of the Russian Language. L., 1982. 112 s.Alkon P.K. Joshua Steele and the melody of speech // Language and Speech. 1959. – Vol. 2. 115 s.Alkon P.K. Joshua Steele and the melody of speech // Language and Speech. 1959. – Vol. 2. 115 s.Bolinger D. Relative height Prosodic Feature Analysis // Analyse des faits prosodiques. Studia Phonetica. 1970/3. 78 s.Bolinger D. Relative height Prosodic Feature Analysis // Analyse des faits prosodiques. Studia Phonetica. 1970/3. 78 s.Danesh F. Sentence intonation from a functional point of view /W/ ord. 1960. № 16.Danesh F. Sentence intonation from a functional point of view /W/ ord. 1960. № 16.Tseplitis L.K.Speech Intonation Analysis. Riga, 1974. 121 s.Tseplitis L.K.Speech Intonation Analysis. Riga, 1974. 121 s.Svetozarova N.D. Pause // Linguistic Encyclopaedic Dictionary. М., 1993. 150 s.Svetozarova N.D. Pause // Linguistic Encyclopaedic Dictionary. М., 1993. 150 s.Dolgova O.V. Halting Speech Semiotics. М., 1974. 12 s .Dolgova O.V. Halting Speech Semiotics. М., 1974. 12 s .Krivnova O.V. Perceptual and semantic meaning of prosodic seams in a connected text // Problems of Phonetics/ Executive Editor L.L. Kasatkin. M., 1995. 14 s.Krivnova O.V. Perceptual and semantic meaning of prosodic seams in a connected text // Problems of Phonetics/ Executive Editor L.L. Kasatkin. M., 1995. 14 s.Krivnova O.V. Automatic synthesis of the Russian speech for an arbitrary text// Works of international seminar for computer linguistics and its applicaitons. Tarusa, 1998. 26 s.Krivnova O.V. Automatic synthesis of the Russian speech for an arbitrary text// Works of international seminar for computer linguistics and its applicaitons. Tarusa, 1998. 26 s.Monaghan A.I. Rhythm and stress shift // Computer Speech and Language, 4. 1990. 12 s.Monaghan A.I. Rhythm and stress shift // Computer Speech and Language, 4. 1990. 12 s.Nikolayeva T.M.Accentuation Semantics. М., «Science», 1982. 162 s .Nikolayeva T.M.Accentuation Semantics. М., «Science», 1982. 162 s .Cheremisina-Yenikolopova N.V. Laws and Rules of the Russian Intonation. Study Guide. М., «Flinta», 1999. 72 s.Cheremisina-Yenikolopova N.V. Laws and Rules of the Russian Intonation. Study Guide. М., «Flinta», 1999. 72 s.Fries C. On the intonation of «Yes-No» question in English // In honor of Daniel Jones. London, 1964. 54 s.Fries C. On the intonation of «Yes-No» question in English // In honor of Daniel Jones. London, 1964. 54 s.Romportl M. Intonological typology // Studies in Phonetic.s Prague, 1973. 41 s.Romportl M. Intonological typology // Studies in Phonetic.s Prague, 1973. 41 s.Vsevolodsky-Herngross V.N.Theory of Russian Speech Intonation. Pg., 1922. 24 s.Vsevolodsky-Herngross V.N.Theory of Russian Speech Intonation. Pg., 1922. 24 s.Kanter L.A.System Analysis of Speech Intonation. М., 1988. 102-105 ss.Kanter L.A.System Analysis of Speech Intonation. М., 1988. 102-105 ss.Torsuyeva I.G. Intonation and meaning of an utterance. М., 1979 9.5 s.Torsuyeva I.G. Intonation and meaning of an utterance. М., 1979 9.5 s.Bolinger D. Intonation as a universal // Principles of typological analysis of languages referred to different order: Collected works under the editorship of B.А.Uspensky. М., 1972. 68-72 ss.Bolinger D. Intonation as a universal // Principles of typological analysis of languages referred to different order: Collected works under the editorship of B.А.Uspensky. М., 1972. 68-72 ss.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.