tilTiltanymTiltanym2411-60762709-135XИнститут языкознания имени А.Байтурсынулы КН МОН РК10.55491/2411-6076-2022-2-74-82til-145Research ArticleСтатьиЯЗЫКОВАЯ КАРТИНА МИРА НА ЯЗЫКЕ ПАМЯТНИКОВ ЗОЛОТОЙ ОРДЫTHE LINGUISTIC PICTURE OF THE WORLD IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE GOLDEN HORDE MONUMENTShttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7281-4167СабырМ.SabyrM.

Уральск

Uralsk

sabir_uralsk@mail.ruЗападно-Казахстанский инновационно-технологический университетКазахстанWest Kazakhstan Innovative and Technological universityKazakhstan202230062022862TILTANYM7785Copyright © Сабыр М., 20222022Сабыр М.Sabyr M.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.tiltanym.kz/jour/article/view/145

В статье письменные памятники периода Золотой орды рассматриваются как целостное языковое наследие, на основе комплексного изучения языка письменных памятников показана их созвучие с духовной культурой казахов. Сделана попытка раскрытия языковой картины мира через языковые явления на основе мировоззренческой общности древней культуры кипчаков и современной казахской культуры, отождествляя язык и этнос как единое целое. Для достижения данной цели сделан этнокультурный анализ фразеологизмов как хранителей и носителей языковой картины мира.

Конкретными данными обоснована способность устойчивых словосочетаний в языке письменных памятников передавать культурную информацию о национальном менталитете, что свидетельствует ее единство, общность и целостность с мировоззрением и миропониманием, культурной традицией казахов, которая берет свое начало у истоков времен.

In the article, written monuments of the Golden Horde period are considered as an integral linguistic heritage, on the basis of a comprehensive study of the language of written monuments, their consonance with the spiritual culture of the Kazakhs is shown. An attempt is made to reveal the linguistic picture of the world through linguistic phenomena based on the ideological community of the ancient culture of the Kipchaks and modern Kazakh culture, identifying language and ethnicity as a single whole. To achieve this goal, an ethnocultural analysis of phraseological units as keepers and carriers of the linguistic picture of the world is made.

Concrete data substantiates the ability of stable phrases in the language of written monuments to convey cultural information about the national mentality, which testifies to its unity, community and integrity with the worldview and understanding of the world, the cultural tradition of the Kazakhs, which originates from the origins of time.

письменные памятникиЗолотая Ордаязыковая картина мирафразеологизмыкипчакидуховная культураmonuments of writingGolden Hordelinguistic picture of the worldphraseologyKipchaksspiritual cultureReferencesTokaev K. (2020) Abaj zhane gasyrdagy Qazaqstan // Egemen Қazaқstan. 2020, 8 qantar. [Tokayev K. (2020) Abay and Kazakhstan in the XXI century // Egemen Kazakhstan. 2020,8 January.] (in Kazakh)Tokayev K. K. Abay and Kazakhstan in the XXI century // Egemen Kazakhstan. 2020,8 January. (in Kazakh)Nazarbaev N. (2017) Bolshaqqa bagdar: ruhani zhangyru // Egemen Қazaқstan. 2017. 12 sauіr. [Nazarbayev N. A. Orientation to the future: modernization of public consciousness // Egemen Kazakhstan. 2017. April 12.] (in Kazakh)Nazarbayev N. A. orientation to the future: modernization of public consciousness // Egemen Kazakhstan. 2017. April 12. (in Kazakh)Manakin V.N. (2004) Sopostavitel’naja leksikologija. – K.: Znanija, 2004. – S. 46. [Manakin V.N. Comparative lexicology. – K.: Knowledge, 2004. – p. 46.] (in Russian)Manakin V.N. Comparative lexicology. – K.: Knowledge, 2004. – p. 46. (in Russian)Hajrullina R.H.(2008) Frazeologicheskaja kartina mira: ot mirovidenija k miroponima niju. 2-e izd. – Ufa: BGPU, 2008. – S. 159. [Khairullina R.H. Phraseological picture of the world: from worldview to worldview. 2nd ed. – Ufa: BSPU, 2008. – p. 159.] (in Russian)Khairullina R.H. Phraseological picture of the world: from worldview to worldview. 2nd ed. – Ufa: BSPU, 2008. – p. 159. (in Russian)Kornilov O. (2003) Jazykovye kartiny mira kak proizvodnye nacional’nyh mentalitetov. 2-e izd., ispr. I dop. – M.: CheRo, 2003. – S. 326. [Kornilov O.Ya. Linguistic worldviews as derivatives of national mentalities. 2nd ed., ispr. and additional – M.: Chero, 2003. – p. 326.] (in Russian)Kornilov O.Ya. Linguistic worldviews as derivatives of national mentalities. 2nd ed., ispr. And additional – M.: Chero, 2003. – p. 326. (in Russian)Kajdarov A. (1988) Tarihi leksikologija zhane jetnolingvistika // Qazaq tіlі tarihi leksikologijasynyn maselelerі. – Almaty: Gylym, 1988. – 33-39 bb. [Kaidarov A. T. Historical lexicology and ethnolinguistics // Problems of historical lexicology of the Kazakh language. Almaty: Nauka publ., 1988, pp. 33-39.] (in Kazakh)Kaidarov A. T. Historical lexicology and ethnolinguistics // problems of historical lexicology of the Kazakh language. Almaty: Nauka publ., 1988, pp. 33-39. (in Kazakh)Popova Z.D., Sternin I.A. (2007) Kognitivnaja lingvistika: Uchebnoe izdanie. – M.: AST: Vostok – Zapad, 2007. – S. 80. [Popova Z.D., Sternin I.A. Cognitive linguistics: Educational edition. – M.: AST: East – West, 2007. – p. 80.] (in Russian)Popova Z.D., Sternin I.A. Cognitive linguistics: Educational edition. – M.: AST: East – West, 2007. – p. 80. (in Russian)Maslova V. (1997) Vvedenie v lingvokul’turologii. – M.: Nasledie, 1997. – 220 s. [Maslova V. Introduction to linguoculturology. – M.: Heritage, 1997. – 220 p.] (in Russian)Maslova V. Introduction to linguoculturology. – M.: Heritage, 1997. – 220 p. (in Russian)Vinogradov V. (1978) Leksicheskie voprosy perevoda hudozhestvennoj prozy. – M.: Vysshaja shkola, 1978. –160 s. [Vinogradov V. Lexical issues of translation of fiction. – M.: Higher School, 1978. -160 p.] (in Russian)Vinogradov V. Lexical issues of translation of fiction. – M.: Higher School ,1978. -160 p.Smagulova G. (1998) Magynalas frazeologizmderdіn ulttyq-madeni aspektіlerі. – Almaty: Gylym, 1998. –194 b. [Smagulova G. N. National and cultural aspects of Semantic phraseology. Almaty: Nauka publ., 1998 -194 P.] (in Kazakh)Smagulova G. N. National and cultural aspects of Semantic phraseology. Almaty: Nauka publ., 1998 -194 P. (in Kazakh)Kenesbaev І. (2007) Qazaq tіlіnіn frazeologizmder sozdіgі. – Almaty: QazAqparat, 2007. –2007. – 356 b. [Kenesbayev I. Dictionary of phraseology of the Kazakh language. - Almaty: Kazinform, 2007. - 356 P.] (in Kazakh)Kenesbayev I. Dictionary of phraseology of the Kazakh language. - Almaty: Kazinform, 2007. - 356 P. (in Kazakh)Babalykov Zh., Turdybaev A. (1983) Qyrandar. – Almaty: Zhalyn, 1983. – 205 b. [Babalykov Zh., Turdybayev A. Eagles. Almaty: Zhalyn publ., 1983. - 205 P.] (in Kazakh)Babalykov Zh., Turdybayev A. Eagles. Almaty: Zhalyn publ., 1983. - 205 P. (in Kazakh)Uraksin Z. (1990) Sravnitel’noe izuchenie i jetimologizacija frazeologizmov v tjurkskih jazykah // Problemy jetimologii tjurkskih jazykov. – Almaty: Nauka, 1990. – S. 245-246. [Uraksin Z. Comparative study and etymologization of phraseological units in Turkic languages // Problems of etymology of Turkic languages. – Almaty: Nauka, 1990. – pp. 245- 246.] (in Russian)Uraksin Z. Comparative study and etymologization of phraseological units in Turkic languages // Problems of etymology of Turkic languages. – Almaty: Nauka, 1990. – pp. 245-246. (in Russian)Eslamgaliuly M. (1995) San qily saual. – Almaty, “Ana Tili”, 1995.May 13. [Eslamgaliuly M. A lot of questions. – Almaty, “Ana tili”, 1995. 13 may] (in Kazakh)Eslamgaliuly M. San qily saual. – Almaty, “Ana Tili”, 1995.May 13. (in Kazakh)

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.